FLOC 2022: FEDERATED LOGIC CONFERENCE 2022
ICLP ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 4TH
Days:
previous day
next day
all days

View: session overviewtalk overviewside by side with other conferences

08:30-09:00Coffee & Refreshments
09:00-10:00 Session 63D: Invited talk by Manuel Hermenegildo: 50th anniversary of the birth of Prolog: Some reflections on Prolog's Evolution, Status, and Future

50th anniversary of the birth of Prolog: Some reflections on Prolog's Evolution, Status, and Future [LINK TO SLIDES]

Abstract: This year we celebrate Prolog's 50th anniversary, and the continued relevance of Prolog and logic programming as a basis for both higher-level programming and symbolic, explainable AI.  This talk will provide an overview of Prolog's evolution, status, and future. It will start with a quick tour of the major milestones in the advancement of the language and its implementations, from the original Marseille and Edinburgh versions, to the many current ones, with more appearing continuously. This will be followed by some reflections on issues such as what still makes Prolog different and relevant as a language and tool, the best approaches for teaching Prolog, some landmark applications, relation to other logic programming languages, or the use of Prolog and Prolog-related tools for other programming languages.  The talk will also attempt to dispel along the way some common misconceptions about the language, while discussing some past weaknesses and others that may still need addressing. It will conclude with some reflections on challenges and opportunities for the future.

Part of the contents of this talk appear in the recent TPLP paper "50 years of Prolog and Beyond", by Philipp Körner, Michael Leuschel, João Barbosa, Vítor Santos Costa, Verónica Dahl, Manuel V. Hermenegildo, Jose F. Morales, Jan Wielemaker, Daniel Diaz, Salvador Abreu, and Giovanni Ciatto, written for Prolog's 50th anniversary and TPLP's 20th anniversary. See prologyear.logicprogramming.org for pointers to this paper and other initiatives related to the Year of Prolog. The Year of Prolog is organized by the Association for Logic Programming and the Prolog Heritage foundation.

Location: Taub 9
10:00-10:30 Session 64: Implementation & Transformations
Location: Taub 9
10:00
Efficient Datalog Rewriting for Query Answering in TGD Ontologies
PRESENTER: Zhe Wang

ABSTRACT. Tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs or existential rules) are an expressive constraint language for ontology-mediated query answering and thus query answering is of high complexity. Existing systems based on first-order rewriting methods can lead to queries too large for DBMS to handle. It is shown that datalog rewriting can result in more compact queries, yet previously proposed datalog rewriting methods are mostly inefficient for implementation. In this paper, we fill the gap by proposing an efficient datalog rewriting approach for answering conjunctive queries over TGDs, and identify and combine existing fragments of TGDs for which our rewriting method terminates. We implemented a prototype system Drewer, and experiments show that it is able to handle a wide range of benchmarks in the literature. Moreover, Drewer shows superior performance over state-of-the-art systems on both the compactness of rewriting and the efficiency of query answering.

10:15
What do you really want to do? Towards a Theory of Intentions for Human-Robot Collaboration
PRESENTER: Mohan Sridharan

ABSTRACT. The architecture described in this paper encodes a theory of intentions based on the key principles of non-procrastination, persistence, and automatically limiting reasoning to relevant knowledge and observations. The architecture reasons with transition diagrams of any given domain at two different resolutions, with the fine-resolution description defined as a refinement of, and hence tightly-coupled to, a coarse-resolution description. For any given goal, nonmonotonic logical reasoning with the coarse-resolution description computes an activity, i.e., a plan, comprising a sequence of abstract actions to be executed to achieve the goal. Each abstract action is implemented as a sequence of concrete actions by automatically zooming to and reasoning with the part of the fine-resolution transition diagram relevant to the current coarse-resolution transition and the goal. Each concrete action in this sequence is executed using probabilistic models of the uncertainty in sensing and actuation, and the corresponding fine-resolution outcomes are used to infer coarse-resolution observations that are added to the coarse-resolution history. The architecture’s capabilities are evaluated in the context of a simulated robot assisting humans in an office domain, on a physical robot (Baxter) manipulating tabletop objects, and on a wheeled robot (Turtlebot) moving objects to particular places or people. The experimental results indicate improvements in reliability and computational efficiency compared with an architecture that does not include the theory of intentions, and an architecture that does not include zooming for fine-resolution reasoning.

10:30-11:00Coffee Break
11:00-12:30 Session 65D: Functional Logic Programming, Datalog & Machine Learning
Location: Taub 9
11:00
From Logic to Functional Logic Programs

ABSTRACT. Logic programming is a flexible programming paradigm due to use of predicates without a fixed data flow. To extend logic languages with the compact notation of functional programming, there are various proposals to map evaluable functions into predicates in order to stay in the logic programming framework. Since amalgamated functional logic languages offer flexible as well as efficient evaluation strategies, we propose an opposite approach in this paper. By mapping logic programs into functional logic programs with a transformation based on inferring functional dependencies, we develop a fully automatic transformation which keeps the flexibility of logic programming but can improve computations by reducing infinite search spaces to finite ones.

11:22
MV-Datalog+/-: Effective Rule-based Reasoning with Uncertain Observations (Best Paper Award)

ABSTRACT. Modern applications combine information from a great variety of sources. Oftentimes, some of these sources, like Machine-Learning systems, are not strictly binary but associated with some degree of (lack of) confidence in the observation. We propose MV-Datalog and MV-Datalog± as extensions of Datalog and Datalog±, respectively, to the fuzzy semantics of infinite-valued Lukasiewicz logic L as languages for effectively reasoning in scenarios where such uncertain observations occur. We show that the semantics of MV-Datalog exhibits similar model-theoretic properties as Datalog. in particular, we show that (fuzzy) entailment can be defined in terms of an analogue of minimal models and give a characterisation, and proof of the uniqueness of such minimal models. On the basis of this characterisation, we propose similar many-valued semantics for rules with existential quantification in the head, extending Datalog±.

11:44
Jumping Evaluation of Nested Regular Path Queries
PRESENTER: Joachim Niehren

ABSTRACT. The propositional dynamic logic is a fundamental language that provides nested regular path queries for datagraphs, as needed for querying graph databases and RDF triple stores. We pro- pose a new algorithm for evaluating nested regular path queries. Not only does it evaluate path queries on datagraphs from a set of start nodes in combined linear time, but also this complex- ity bound depends only on the size of the query’s top-down needed subgraph, a notion that we introduce formally. For many queries relevant in practice, the top-down neeeded subgraph is way smaller than the whole datagraph. Our algorithm is based on a new compilation schema from nested regular path queries to monadic datalog queries that we introduce. We prove that the top-down evaluation of the datalog program visits only the top-down needed subgraph for the path query. Thereby, the combined linear time complexity depending on the size of the top-down needed subgraph is implied by a general complexity result for top-down datalog evaluation (Tekle and Liu 2010). As an application, we show that our algorithm permits to reformulate in simple terms a variant of a very efficient automata-based algorithm proposed by Maneth and Nguyen that evaluates navigational path queries in datatrees based on indexes and jumping. Moreover, our variant overcomes some limitations of Maneth and Nguyen’s: it is not bound to trees and applies to graphs; it is not limited to forward navigational XPath but can treat any nested regular path query and it can be implemented efficiently without any specialized or dedicated techniques, by simply using any efficient datalog evaluator.

12:06
FOLD-RM: A Scalable and Efficient Inductive Learning Algorithm for Multi-Category Classification of Mixed Data
PRESENTER: Gopal Gupta

ABSTRACT. FOLD-RM is an automated inductive learning algorithm for learning default rules for mixed (numerical and categorical) data. It generates an (explainable) answer set programming (ASP) rule set for multi-category classification tasks while maintaining efficiency and scalability. The FOLD-RM algorithm is competitive in performance with the widely-used XGBoost algorithm, however, unlike XGBoost, the FOLD-RM algorithm produces an explainable model. FOLD-RM outperforms XGBoost on some datasets, particularly large ones. FOLD-RM also provides human-friendly explanations for predictions as well as natural language translation of the default rules learned.

12:30-14:00Lunch Break

Lunch will be held in Taub lobby (CP, LICS, ICLP) and in The Grand Water Research Institute (KR, FSCD, SAT).

14:00-14:30 Session 67D: Best DC Paper (Alice Tarzariol): A Model-Oriented Approach for Lifting Symmetries in Answer Set Programming

When solving combinatorial problems, pruning symmetric solution candidates from the search space is essential. Most of the existing approaches are instance-specific and focus on the automatic computation of Symmetry Breaking Constraints (SBCs) for each given problem instance. However, the application of such approaches to large-scale instances or advanced problem encodings might be problematic since the computed SBCs are propositional and, therefore, can neither be meaningfully interpreted nor transferred to other instances. As a result, a time-consuming recomputation of SBCs must be done before every invocation of a solver.

To overcome these limitations, we introduce a new model-oriented approach for Answer Set Programming that lifts the SBCs of small problem instances into a set of interpretable first-order constraints using a form of machine learning called Inductive Logic Programming. After targeting simple combinatorial problems, we aim to extend our method to be applied also for advanced decision and optimization problems.

Location: Taub 9
14:30-15:00 Session 68: 10-Year Test-of-Time Award (Torsten Schaub, Max Ostrowski): From "ASP modulo CSP" to "ASP modulo X", or how clingcon paved the way for clingo[X] systems

From "ASP modulo CSP" to "ASP modulo X", or how clingcon paved the way for clingo[X] systems

Abstract: Clingcon extends the ASP system Clingo with linear constraints over integers. As such, its series of variants served as a consecutive design study onhow to extend ASP systems with foreign inferences. Meanwhile this has culminated in the generic theory reasoning framework of the ASP system clingo.We will sketch the evolution of this technology, look at its current state, and emphasis the role of semantics in view of a successful outcome.

 

Location: Taub 9
15:00-15:30 Session 69B: Semantics
Location: Taub 9
15:00
ASP-Based Declarative Process Mining

ABSTRACT. We propose Answer Set Programming (ASP) as an approach for modeling and solving problems from the area of Declarative Process Mining (DPM). We consider here three classical problems, namely, Log Generation, Conformance Checking, and Query Checking. These problems are addressed from both a control-flow and a data-aware perspective. The approach is based on the representation of process specifications as (finite-state) automata. Since these are strictly more expressive than the defacto DPM standard specification language DECLARE, more general specifications than those typical of DPM can be handled, such as formulas in linear-time temporal logic over finite traces.

15:15
Implementing Stable-Unstable Semantics with ASPTOOLS and Clingo

ABSTRACT. Normal logic programs subject to stable model semantics cover reasoning problems from the first level of polynomial time hierarchy (PH) in a natural way. Disjunctive programs reach one level beyond this, but the access to the underlying NP oracle(s) is somewhat implicit and available for the programmer using the so-called saturation technique. To address this shortcoming, stable-unstable semantics was proposed, making oracles explicit as subprograms having no stable models. If this idea is applied recursively, any level of PH can be reached with normal programs only, in analogy to quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs). However, for the moment, no native implementations of stable-unstable semantics have emerged except via translations toward QBFs. In this work, we alleviate this situation with a translation of (effectively) normal programs that combines a main program with any fixed number of oracles subject to stable-unstable semantics. The result is a disjunctive program that can be fed as input for answer set solvers supporting disjunctive programs. The idea is to hide saturation from the programmer altogether, although it is exploited by the translation internally. The translation of oracles is performed using translators and linkers from the ASPTOOLS collection while Clingo is used as the back-end solver.

15:30-16:00Coffee Break
16:00-17:00 Session 70: Plenary
16:00
Complexity Measures for Reactive Systems

ABSTRACT. A reactive system maintains an on-goint interaction with its environment. At each moment in time, the system receives from the environment an assignment to the input signals and responds with an assignment to the output signals. The system is correct with respect to a given specification if, for all environments, the infinite computation that is generated by the interaction between the system and the environment satisfies the specification. Reactive systems are modeled by transducers: finite state machines whose transitions are labeled by assignments to the input signals and whose states are labeled by assignments to the output signals. In the synthesis problem, we automatically transform a given specification into a correct transducer.

While complexity measures receive much attention in the design of algorithms, they are less explored in the context of synthesis. This is a serious drawback: just as we cannot imagine an algorithm designer that accepts a correct algorithm without checking its complexity, we cannot expect designers of reactive systems to accept synthesized systems that are only guaranteed to be correct. It is not clear, however, how to define the complexity of a transducer. Unlike the case of algorithms (or Turing machines in general), there is no "size of input" to relate to, and measures like time and space complexity are irrelevant. Indeed, we care for on-going interactions, along which the transducer reacts instantly according to its transition function. One immediate complexity measure for a transducer is its size, but many more complexity measures are of interest. The talk discusses such measures and describes how the search for optimal reactive systems affects the synthesis problem.