View: session overviewtalk overview
Welcome and introduction Dr. Ouassim Karrakchou (from International University of Rabat and Local Organising Committee Chair)
Prof Therese Keane (IPC chair)
Professor Don Passey (TC3 Chair)
Prof Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta As generative AI gains momentum in education, public discourse increasingly positions education as the system in need of urgent reform, while presenting AI as a mature and inevitable solution. This keynote challenges that narrative by drawing on over five decades of research in Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), arguing that many of today’s headline concerns such as personalisation, scalability, and efficiency, are far from new, and that AIED’s accumulated insights are being overlooked just when they are most needed. Rather than casting AI as a replacement for teachers or assessments, I will highlight AI’s strength as a scientific instrument for investigating how people learn and the conditions under which learning thrives. This reframing invites deeper, often neglected questions, not only about what AI can do, but how its presence reshapes learners’ motivation, attention, memory, and agency, and what it therefore ought to do in order to support education meaningfully. By revisiting AIED’s core contributions – from instructional design and learner modelling to metacognition and socially grounded interaction – the talk offers a starting point for better understanding and anticipating what learners, educators, and systems should expect from AI. It explores the idea that the limitations of general-purpose AI systems are not only technical, but also conceptual and ethical: what we fail to ask about learning, we inevitably fail to design for. The keynote calls for a more reflective and historically informed conversation – one that positions AI first as a tool for deepening our understanding of learning and of the human capacities for education to cultivate, before it becomes a vehicle for desirable change.
| 14:00 | Exploring AI – A Case Study on Programming Neural Networks ABSTRACT. This study examines exploratory learning activities in the context of programming a neural network for classification. Building on a concise starter project, it identi-fies activities aligned with Kolb’s model of experiential learning. These activities can be initiated through targeted instructional prompts and carried out inde-pendently by students, supported by generative AI tools. |
| 14:30 | A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Education Frameworks: Global Perspectives Abstract PRESENTER: Jayanti Nayak ABSTRACT. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to evolve and influence education, global discussions increasingly call for curriculum reforms that integrate AI literacy and AI competencies. To better understand how educational jurisdic-tions are responding to this change, a literature search was conducted to ex-plore educational policy guidelines and the extent to which national curricu-la focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and related competencies. To guide this review, five AI in education (AIED) frameworks were selected for com-parative analysis: the AI4K12 framework (USA), the AI Literacy Framework (EU), the Chinese National Guidelines for AI Education (China), the Aus-tralian Generative AI in Schools (Australia) and the AI Competency Frame-work for Students (UNESCO). This paper presents a comparison of these global five frameworks, through document and thematic analysis, examining their underlying goals, objectives, focus areas, pedagogical perspectives and concepts covered. The analysis highlights the similarities and differences centred around the themes that were derived from AI literature. The findings revealed significant alignment across the five frameworks on key themes such as the ethical use of AI, AI literacy, and skill development in designing AI solutions. However, notable differences were observed in their specific educational objectives, thematic focus, and the range of AI topics addressed. These findings can provide valuable insight for AI curriculum development, guiding educators and policymakers in creating balanced and comprehensive AI education programs. |
| 14:00 | What Shapes Fifth Graders' Conceptions About Artificial Intelligence? PRESENTER: Torsten Brinda ABSTRACT. This study explores German 5th-grade students’ conceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) and the factors influencing them. Using a modified questionnaire and qualitative content analysis, responses from 48 students were examined. Results reveal that nearly half of the participants either lacked a concept of AI or misunderstood it, often associating AI with creativity due to linguistic confusion between “künstlich” (artificial) and “künstlerisch” (artistic). Although 75% were familiar with voice assistants, very few identified these as AI systems. Media -especially television, films, and social media - was the most frequently cited influence, often fostering anthropomorphic or robotic conceptions of AI. Additional influences included family, teachers, and everyday experiences. The findings emphasize the need for targeted AI education that addresses prevalent misconceptions and leverages students’ lived experiences to build accurate mental models. |
| 14:30 | Doing vs. Being Agile in K-12 Computer Science Education: Moving from Methodology to Mindset PRESENTER: Konstantin Oltmann ABSTRACT. Agile methods from software development have increasingly been adopted into K-12 computer science education. In this position paper, we explore how lessons learned from industry about the distinction between simply applying agile practices (Doing Agile) and genuinely embedding agile values (Being Agile) can enrich K-12 computer science education. Our literature review shows generally positive impacts of various agile-based educational approaches on student engagement and project outcomes. However, explicit teaching and sustained integration of agile values have so far received little to no attention in research.We argue that explicitly fostering an agile mindset with focus on adaptability, collaboration, and continuous reflection significantly enhances computer science education, equipping students to navigate a complex and uncertain future. Finally, we outline essential conditions for successfully embedding agile values and highlight critical areas requiring further empirical research. |
Reimagining the Learning Environment: Pedagogy, Assessment, and Human Dignity in the AI Era
Presenters:
-
Yuko Murakami – Humanities: What Should Be Nurtured in the Age of GAI
-
Said A.S. Yunus & Eliana El-Khoury – Deepening Formative and Alternative Assessment of Human Skills in AI-Augmented Learning Environments
-
Mary Webb – AI-Enhanced Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges
| 14:00 | Reimagining the Learning Environment: Pedagogy, Assessment, and Human Dignity in the AI Era PRESENTER: Toshinori Saito ABSTRACT. Agentic AI creates profound contradictions in higher education, challenging traditional pedagogy. This symposium explores ways to resolve these contradictions and expand learning environments. Uniting perspectives on ethics, authentic assessment, and human-AI agency, it fosters dialogue on redesigning pedagogy for authentic learning, centred on human dignity. Presenters:
|
| 15:15 | The Role and Impact of Breakthrough Technologies in Contemporary Educational Research: An Analysis of Leading Journals and IFIP TC3’s Official Journal PRESENTER: Javier Osorio ABSTRACT. This paper examines the prominence and influence of breakthrough technologies (BTs) in current educational research, focusing on publications from leading journals in the Education & Educational Research category and the official journal of IFIP's Technical Committee 3 (TC3). The study analyses the extent to which BTs are represented in top-tier journals, highlighting the significant role of AI-related technologies and their transformative potential in education. The paper also discusses the alignment of IFIP TC3's activities and its journal with international research trends, emphasizing the committee's commitment to addressing challenges posed by BTs in education. Findings suggest that BTs are not a passing fad but a solid trend shaping the future educational landscape. However, the paper calls for deeper theoretical grounding and rigorous research to fully harness these technologies' potential. |
| 15:45 | ChatGPT: An AI-Powered Tutoring System for Introductory Programming That Avoids Giving Direct Solutions PRESENTER: Futaba Yoneyma ABSTRACT. The consideration of using generative AI is being advanced across various domains. In programming education, however, there are concerns regarding its implementation, including the possibility that presenting program code may prevent students from thinking and the difficulty of describing accurate assignment specifications into prompts. To address these issues, this study designed and developed "ChotGPT", which provides functions to "avoid presenting direct solutions" and "assist generating prompt for code review using assignment specifications", with the aim of supporting learning in introductory programming courses. An empirical study has been conducted with approximately 280 first-year students in an introductory programming course in an interdisciplinary department during the 2024 academic year. The average usage rate per assignment reached approximately 30%. Through analysis of usage logs and questionnaires, we checked that the effectiveness of the two distinctive functions were generally supported by students throughout the exercises over ten weeks. |