View: session overviewtalk overview
08:30 | TBA |
09:00 | Image Guided Therapy |
10:15 | Navigation for General Surgery Applications |
10:30 | Anatomical Modeling to Improve the Precision of Image Guided Liver Ablation PRESENTER: Kristy Brock |
10:45 | Image Guidance in Brain and Spine Surgery: Beyond Precision |
11:00 | A Retrospective Study Comparing Straight and Curved Insertion Paths for Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy to Treat Brain Tumors and Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy PRESENTER: Sarah Frisken |
11:15 | Quantitative fluorescence imaging for guiding surgical resection of brain tumor |
11:30 | Nanoprobes for Cancer Imaging and Therapy |
13:00 | Image-Guided Technologies for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: What We Have and What We Need |
13:15 | The evolving role of confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography to guide Mohs surgery |
13:30 | Near Infrared Nerve-Specific Fluorophores for Improved Nerve Sparing during Prostatectomy PRESENTER: Summer Gibbs |
13:45 | Multiscale Spectroscopic Photoacoustic Image Instrumentation for Prostate Cancer Detection |
14:00 | Ultrasound-switchable fluorescence imaging for breast cancer surgery guidance PRESENTER: Baohong Yuan |
14:15 | Temperature-Sensitive Frozen Tissue Imaging Using STIR-UTE MRI for MRI-Guided Prostate Focal Cryoablation PRESENTER: Junichi Tokuda |
14:45 | Reflectance confocal microscopy-guided carbon dioxide laser ablation of low-risk basal cell carcinomas: A prospective study. PRESENTER: Saud Aleissa |
14:45 | Evaluation of Extramammary Paget Disease with Hand-Held Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A PRESENTER: Saud Aleissa |
14:45 | Clinical Usability of Videomosaicking with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Mapping Cancer Margins in vivo to guide Treatment PRESENTER: Kivanc Kose |
14:45 | Dynamic in vivo imaging of tumor-immune microenvironment (TiME) and microvasculature in skin cancers for potential prognosis prediction PRESENTER: Aditi Sahu |
14:45 | Pre-operative imaging of oral cancer margins in vivo with a handheld reflectance confocal microscope and video-mosaicking approach: a feasibility study PRESENTER: Gary Peterson |
14:45 | Combined Reflectance Confocal Microscopy - Optical Coherence Tomography for Detection and Deep Margin Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinomas: A Clinical Study PRESENTER: Aditi Sahu |
14:45 | Utilizing Machine Learning for Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Skin Cancer Care PRESENTER: Kivanc Kose |
14:45 | Combining a nuclear contrast agent (PARPi-FL) with fluorescence confocal microscopy to improve noninvasive diagnosis of basal cell carcinomas PRESENTER: Manu Jain |
14:45 | Development of Exposure Phase Navigation as a Training Aid in Robotic Surgery PRESENTER: Michael Kokko |
14:45 | Intraoperative tongue deformation estimation using FEM-multibody modeling and intraoperative tracking: cadaver cases PRESENTER: Xiaotian Wu |
14:45 | Shift Compensation in Epilepsy Surgery PRESENTER: Xiaoyao Fan |
14:45 | Stereovision-based Image Updating in Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery PRESENTER: Keith Paulsen |
14:45 | Body-Mounted Robotic Assistant for MRI-Guided Lumbar Spinal Injections PRESENTER: Gang Li |
14:45 | Design and Workspace Analysis of a Patient Mounted Liver Ablation Robot PRESENTER: Yue Chen |
14:45 | Fusion assisted biopsy of a heterogenous left thoracic neurofibroma in a 23-year-old female: A case study of a multimodal non-rigid registration device PRESENTER: Nikhil Gowda |
14:45 | Image-guided robotic surgery for reduction and fixation of pelvic fractures PRESENTER: Ali Uneri |
14:45 | Deformable MR to Cone-Beam CT Registration for High-Precision Neuro-Endoscopic Surgery PRESENTER: Michael Ketcha |
14:45 | 3D CBT image-guided autonomous robotic pedicle screw placement: A feasibility study PRESENTER: Cristian Atria ABSTRACT. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the potential advantages of using 3D cone beam tomosynthesis imaging to guide automated robotic pedicle screw placements. Current robotic systems are only partially automated, only providing a guide tube for manual site preparation and screw insertion. One reason robotic autonomy has been limited is because the risk introduced by system inaccuracy is high. Intraoperative 3D imaging could be used to control such risk, but current 3D systems are cumbersome, interrupt the workflow, and take many minutes to obtain a single image. 3D cone beam tomosynthesis could overcome such issues. In this study, the robotic and imaging systems were used side-by-side while placing pedicle screws in a cadaver, to explore their potential integration to provide a real-time autonomous intraoperative solution. Methods: The study was performed in a single cadaver. The imaging system and robot were placed on opposite sides of the subject. The subject was shifted slightly toward the imaging system to capture a dual-view (RAO/LAO) tomographic image. The image was transferred to the robot’s planning workstation where a neurosurgeon used the images to plan three pedicle screw placements; one each in L2, L3, and L4. The subject was shifted laterally toward the robot where the robot was hand-guided to touch 6 fiducial markers embedded in the subject (for image/robot registration) and then enabled to automatically drill pilot holes and place the three screws. A postoperative image was captured and used to compute placement accuracy. Results: All three screws were successfully placed by the robot with no pedicle breeches. The average insertion point error was 2.5 mm. It was possible to co-locate the robot and imaging system such that an image could be captured showing both the spine and the drill bit positioned for pilot-hole creation. Discussion: This feasibility study demonstrates that 3D cone beam tomosynthesis images can be used to plan and guide automated robotic screw placement. The errors are comparable to commercial robotic spine surgery systems, and the dose is significantly lower. The study also demonstrates that the systems can work in close proximity to each other with minimal effort required to switch from imaging to screw placement. In some cases the systems can operate simultaneously. There could be further efficiencies derived from integrating the systems. |
14:45 | Image Quality in Cone Beam Tomosynthesis PRESENTER: Cristian Atria ABSTRACT. Methods: A CBT system operates by acquiring fast fluoro acquisitions taken in a circular tomosynthesis geometry and reconstructing a 3D volume providing near real-time images of the surgical scene. The reconstruction is done via iterative reconstruction and makes proficient use of prior information to solve an ill posed inverse problem. Prior information can be in the form of traditional regularization, model based imaging (dynamic system and temporal evolution models), density constraint based on object recognition, and rich priors based on convolutional neural networks. The system is capable of stereo tomosynthesis. IQ and dose were previousy assessed and presented at RSNA 2018. The purpose of this presentation is to provide the current state of the technology along with current IQ and dose numbers. IQ is assessed via quantitative metrics measured on an accreditation phantom and qualitative assessments of cadaveric specimen imaging with and without metal implants. Scatter and absorbed dose are assessed via an ion chamber placed at operator chest height and via nanodots placed on the organs of an anthropomorphic phantom. Results: Image quality metrics were computed, with a focus on metrics relevant to imaging for spinal fusion procedures: high-density attenuation fidelity, geometric accuracy and high-contrast resolution. Absorbed Dose is 110 uSv, Scatter Dose is 20 uRem for CBT. For the first time, CBT imaging of cadaveric thoracic and cervical specimens are being presented. These images were assessed by surgeons and show acceptable clinical usability. Conclusions: CBT performance is approaching the current state of the art 3D imaging in terms of resolution and CNR. CBT lags in image uniformity but has clinically usable images that are obtained at a fraction of the dose, with strong potential for pediatric surgical imaging. |
14:45 | Clinical Translation of Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging System for Surgical Guidance PRESENTER: Peter Pellionisz |
14:45 | Dynamic Optical Contrast Imaging: A Technique of Potentials PRESENTER: Yong Hu |
14:45 | A Real-time Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging System for Intraoperative Tissue Differentiation PRESENTER: Shan Huang |
14:45 | A Preliminary Study of Needle and Guide Dynamic Interaction for Targeted Interventions PRESENTER: Pankaj Kulkarni |
14:45 | A Novel 4-DOF Manipulator for MRI-guided Transperineal Prostate Intervention PRESENTER: Pradipta Biswas |
14:45 | Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model for In Situ MR-Guided Conformal Ablation using Robotically-Delivered Needle-Based Therapeutic Ultrasound PRESENTER: Gregory Fischer |
14:45 | A machine-readable representation of PI-RADS reports using the DICOM standard PRESENTER: Andrey Fedorov |
14:45 | Determining the role of MR-guided biopsy in indeterminate PI-RADS 3 lesions PRESENTER: Andrés Camacho |
14:45 | Feasibility study of Q-space trajectory imaging (QTI) for assessment of tissue microstructure in prostate cancer to assist with target selection for prostate biopsy PRESENTER: Bjoern Langbein |
14:45 | National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons PRESENTER: Andrey Fedorov |
14:45 | Feasibility of Quantitative MR Based Hypoxia Measurements in the Setting of Interstitial High Dose Rate Brachytherapy of the Cervix PRESENTER: Robert Cormack |
14:45 | Surgical Port and Trajectory Planning for PCNL Surgery Using CT Imaging and Genetic Algorithms PRESENTER: Moiz Khan |
14:45 | Multimodal Deformable Registration via GAN-based Image Translation and Dual-Stream Learning Network PRESENTER: Zhe Xu |
14:45 | A Surface Reconstruction and Registration-based Navigation System to Handle Tissue Deformation PRESENTER: Haoyin Zhou |
14:45 | Data-Driven Identification of Intra-tumor Metabolic Heterogeneity of Glioblastoma using Variational Autoencoder PRESENTER: Walid Abdelmoula |
14:45 | Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentation PRESENTER: Tina Kapur |