FLOC 2018: FEDERATED LOGIC CONFERENCE 2018
FM ON MONDAY, JULY 16TH
Days:
previous day
next day
all days

View: session overviewtalk overviewside by side with other conferences

09:00-10:00 Session 110B: FM Invited Talk: Leonardo de Moura
Location: Blavatnik LT1
09:00
Efficient verification and metaprogramming in Lean

ABSTRACT. In this talk, we provide a short introduction to the Lean theorem prover and its metaprogramming framework. We also describe how this framework extends Lean's object language with an API to many of Lean's internal structures and procedures, and provides ways of reflecting object-level expressions into the metalanguage. We provide evidence to show that our implementation is performant, and that it provides a convenient and flexible way of writing not only small-scale interactive tactics, but also more substantial kinds of automation.

We view this as important progress towards our overarching goal of bridging the gap between interactive and automated reasoning. Users who develop libraries for interactive use can now more easily develop special-purpose automation to go with them thereby encoding procedural heuristics and expertise alongside factual knowledge. At the same time, users who want to use Lean as a back end to assist in complex verification tasks now have flexible means of adapting Lean's libraries and automation to their specific needs. As a result, our metaprogramming language opens up new opportunities, allowing for more natural and intuitive forms of interactive reasoning, as well as for more flexible and reliable forms of automation.

More information about Lean can be found at http://leanprover.github.io.  

The interactive book "Theorem Proving in Lean'' (https://leanprover.github.io/theorem_proving_in_lean) is the standard reference for Lean. The book is available in PDF and HTML formats. In the HTML version, all examples and exercises can be executed in the reader's web browser.

10:00-10:30 Session 111
Location: Blavatnik LT1
10:00
Optimal and Robust Controller Synthesis Using Energy Timed Automata with Uncertainty

ABSTRACT. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for the synthesis of robust and optimal energy-aware controllers. The framework is based on energy timed automata, allowing for easy expression of timing-constraints and variable energy-rates. We prove decidability of the energy-constrained infinite-run problem in settings with both certainty and uncertainty of the energy-rates. We also consider the optimization problem of identifying the minimal upper bound that will permit existence of energy-constrained infinite runs. Our algorithms are based on quantifier elimination for linear real arithmetic. Using Mathematica and Mjollnir, we illustrate our framework through a real industrial example of a hydraulic oil pump. Compared with previous approaches our method is completely automated and provides improved results.

10:30-11:00Coffee Break
11:00-12:30 Session 112B
Chair:
Location: Blavatnik LT1
11:00
Encoding fairness in a synchronous concurrent program algebra
SPEAKER: Ian J. Hayes

ABSTRACT. Concurrent program refinement algebra provides a suitable basis for supporting mechanised reasoning about shared-memory concurrent programs in a compositional manner, for example, it supports the rely/guarantee approach of Jones. The algebra makes use of a synchronous parallel operator motivated by Aczel’s trace model of concurrency and with similarities to Milner’s SCCS. This paper looks a defining a form of fairness within the program algebra. The encoding allows one to reason about the fair execution of a single process in isolation as well as define fair parallel in terms of base parallel operator, of which no fairness properties are assumed. An algebraic theory to support fairness and fair parallel is developed.

11:30
A wide-spectrum language for verification of programs on weak memory models
SPEAKER: Robert Colvin

ABSTRACT. Modern processors deploy a variety of weak memory models, which for efficiency reasons may (appear to) execute instructions in an order different to that specified by the program text. The consequences of instruction reordering can be complex and subtle, and can impact on ensuring correctness. Previous work on the semantics of weak memory models has focussed on the behaviour of assembler-level programs. In this paper we utilise that work to extract some general principles underlying instruction reordering, and apply those principles to a wide-spectrum language encompassing abstract data types as well as low-level assembler code. The goal is to support reasoning about implementations of data structures for modern processors with respect to an abstract specification.

Specifically, we define an operational semantics, from which we derive some properties of program refinement, and encode the semantics in the rewriting engine Maude as a model checking tool. The tool is used to validate the semantics against the behaviour of a set of litmus tests (small assembler programs) reported on hardware, and also to model check implementations of data structures from the literature against their abstract specifications.

12:00
Operational Semantics of a Weak Memory Model with Channel Synchronization
SPEAKER: Daniel Fava

ABSTRACT. A multitude of weak memory models exists supporting various types of relaxations and different synchronization primitives. On one hand, such models must be lax enough to account for hardware and compiler optimizations; on the other, the more lax the model, the harder it is to understand and program for. Though the right balance is up for debate, a memory model should provide what is known as the SC-DRF guarantee, meaning that data-race free programs behave in a sequentially consistent manner.
We present a weak memory model for a calculus inspired by the Go programming language. Thus, different from previous approaches, we focus on a memory model with buffered channel communication as the sole synchronization primitive. We formalize our model via an operational semantics, which allows us to prove the SC-DRF guarantee using a standard simulation technique. Contrasting against an axiomatic semantics, where the notion of a program is abstracted away as a graph with memory events as nodes, we believe our semantics and simulation proof can be clearer and easier to understand. Finally, we provide a concrete implementation in K, a rewrite-based executable semantic framework, and derive an interpreter for the proposed language.

11:00-12:30 Session 112C
11:00
Stepwise Development and Model Checking of a Distributed Interlocking System - using RAISE

ABSTRACT. This paper considers the challenge of designing and verifying control protocols for geographically distributed railway interlocking systems. It describes for a real-world case study how this can be tackled by stepwise development and model checking of state transition models in an extension of the RAISE Specification Language (RSL). This method also allows different variants of the control protocols to be explored.

11:30
Resource-aware Design for Reliable Autonomous Applications with Multiple Periods
SPEAKER: Rongjie Yan

ABSTRACT. Reliability is the most important design issue for current autonomous vehicles. How to guarantee reliability and reduce hardware cost is key for the design of such complex control systems intertwined with scenario-related multi-period timing behaviors. The paper presents a reliability and resource-aware design framework for embedded implementation of such autonomous applications, where each scenario may have its own timing constraints. The constraints are formalized with the consideration of different redundancy based fault-tolerant techniques and software to hardware allocation choices, which capture the static and various causality relations of such systems. Both exact and heuristic-based methods have been implemented to derive the lower bound of hardware usage, in terms of processor, for the given reliability requirement. The case study on a realistic autonomous vehicle controller demonstrates the effectiveness and feasibility of the framework.

12:00
Verifying Auto-Generated C Code from Simulink

ABSTRACT. This paper presents our experience with formal verification of C code that is automatically generated from Simulink open-loop controller models. We apply the state-of-the-art commercial model checker BTC EmbeddedPlatform to two industrial case studies: Driveline State Request and E-Clutch Control. These case studies contain various features (decision logic, floating-point arithmetic, rate limiters and state-flow systems) implemented in discrete-time logic. The diverse features and the extensive use of floating-point variables make the formal code verification more challenging. The paper reports our findings, identifies shortcomings and strengths of formal verification when adopted in an automotive setting. We also provide recommendations to tool developers and requirement engineers so as to integrate formal code verification into the automotive mass product development.

12:30-14:00Lunch Break
14:00-15:30 Session 115: FLoC Plenary Lecture: Byron Cook
Location: Maths LT1
14:00
Formal Reasoning about the Security of Amazon Web Services

ABSTRACT. Amazon Web Services (AWS) uses and develops tools based on formal verification to reason about the security of AWS itself, as well as the security of systems that customers build on AWS. This talk will focus on how AWS services connect customers to logic-based techniques, as well as how AWS uses formal verification internally to provide higher assurance of its security.

15:30-16:00Coffee Break
16:00-18:00 Session 116A: Oxford Union Debate: Ethics & Morality of Robotics

Public debate on "Ethics & Morality of Robotics" with panelists specializing in ethics, law, computer science, data security and privacy:

  • Prof Matthias Scheutz, Dr Sandra Wachter, Prof Jeannette Wing, Prof Francesca Rossi, Prof Luciano Floridi & Prof Ben Kuipers

See http://www.floc2018.org/public-debate/ for further details and to register.

Location: Oxford Union
16:00-18:00 Session 116B
Location: Blavatnik LT1
16:00
QFLan: A Tool for the Quantitative Analysis of Highly Reconfigurable Systems
SPEAKER: Andrea Vandin

ABSTRACT. QFLan offers modeling and analysis of highly reconfigurable systems, like product lines, which are characterized by combinatorially many system variants (or products) that can be obtained via different combinations of installed features. The tool offers a modern integrated development environment for the homonym probabilistic feature-oriented language. QFLan allows the specification of a family of products in terms of a feature model with quantitative attributes, which defines the valid feature combinations, and probabilistic behavior subject to quantitative constraints. The language's behavioral part enables dynamic installation, removal and replacement of features. QFLan has a discrete-time Markov chain semantics, permitting quantitative analyses. Thanks to a seamless integration with the statistical model checker MultiVeStA, it allows for analyses like the likelihood of specific behavior or the expected average value of non-functional aspects related to feature attributes.

16:30
Modular Verification of Programs with Effects and Effect Handlers in Coq
SPEAKER: Thomas Letan

ABSTRACT. Modern systems have grown in complexity, and the attack surface has increased accordingly. Even though system components are generally carefully designed, and even verified, by different groups of people, the composition of these components is often regarded with less attention. This paves the way for “architectural attacks,” a class of security vulnerabilities where the attacker is able to threaten the security of the system even if each of its component continues to act according to their specifications. In this article, we introduce FreeSpec, a Coq framework built upon the key idea that components can be modelled as programs with algebraic effects to be realised by other components. FreeSpec allows for the modular modelling of a complex system, by defining idealised components connected together, and the modular verification of the properties of their composition. In doing so, we propose a novel approach for the Coq proof assistant to reason about programs with effects in a modular way.

17:00
Combining Tools for Optimization and Analysis of Floating-Point Computations
SPEAKER: Heiko Becker

ABSTRACT. Recent renewed interest in optimization and analysis of floating-point programs has lead to a diverse array of new tools for numerical programs. These tools are often complementary, each focusing on a distinct aspect of numerical programming. Building reliable floating point applications typically requires addressing several of these aspects, which makes easy composition essential. This paper describes the composition of two recent floating-point tools: Herbie, which performs accuracy optimization, and Daisy, which performs accuracy verification. We find that the combination provides numerous benefits to users, such as being able to use Daisy to check whether Herbie's unsound optimizations improved the worst-case roundoff error, as well as benefits to tool authors, including uncovering a number of bugs in both tools. The combination also allowed us to compare the different program rewriting techniques implemented by these tools for the first time. The paper lays out a road map for combining other floating-point tools and for surmounting common challenges.

17:30
A Formally Verified Floating-Point Implementation of the Compact Position Reporting Algorithm
SPEAKER: Cesar Munoz

ABSTRACT. The Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) system allows aircraft to communicate their current state, including position and velocity information, to other aircraft in their vicinity and to ground stations. The Compact Position Reporting (CPR) algorithm is the ADS-B module responsible for the encoding and decoding of aircraft positions. CPR is highly sensitive to computer arithmetic since it heavily relies on functions that are intrinsically unstable such as floor and modulo. In this paper, a formally-verified double-precision floating-point implementation of the CPR algorithm is presented. The verification proceeds in three steps. First, an alternative version of CPR, which reduces the floating-point rounding error is proposed. Then, the Prototype Verification System (PVS) is used to formally prove that the ideal real-number counterpart of the improved algorithm is mathematically equivalent to the standard CPR definition. Finally, the static analyzer Frama-C is used to verify that the double-precision implementation of the improved algorithm is correct with respect to its operational requirement. The alternative algorithm is currently being considered for inclusion in the revised version of the ADS-B standards document as the reference implementation of the CPR algorithm.

16:00-18:00 Session 116C
16:00
Formal Verification of Automotive Simulink Controller Models: Empirical Technical Challenges, Evaluation and Recommendations

ABSTRACT. The automotive industry makes increasing usage of Simulink-based software development. Typically, automotive Simulink designs are analyzed using non-formal test methods, which do not guarantee the absence of errors. In contrast, formal verification techniques aim at providing formal guarantees or counterexamples that the analyzed designs fulfill their requirements for all possible input and parameters. Therefore, the safety standard ISO 26262 recommends the usage of formal methods for the software development process for safety-critical systems.

In this paper, we report on the application of formal verification to check discrete-time properties of a previously tested Simulink model for a park assistant feature using the commercial Simulink Design Verifier tool. During our evaluation, we experienced a gap between the offered functionalities and typical industrial needs, which hindered the successful application of this tool in the context of model-based development. We discuss these issues and propose solutions related to system development, requirements specification and verification tools, in order to prepare the ground for the effective integration of computer-assisted formal verification in automotive Simulink-based development.

16:30
Multi-Robot LTL Planning Under Uncertainty

ABSTRACT. Robot applications are increasingly based on teams of robots that collaborate to perform a desired mission. Such applications ask for decentralized techniques that allow for tractable automated planning. Another aspect that current robot applications must consider is partial knowledge about the environment in which the robots are operating and the uncertainty associated with the outcome of the robots' actions.

Current planning techniques used for teams of robots that perform complex missions do not systematically address these challenges: they are either based on centralized solutions and hence not scalable, they consider rather simple missions, such as A-to-B travel, they do not work in partially known environments. We present a planning solution that decomposes the team of robots into subclasses, considers high-level missions given in temporal logic, and at the same time works when only partial knowledge of the environment is available. We prove the correctness of the solution and evaluate its effectiveness on a set of realistic examples.

17:00
Vector Barrier Certificates and Comparison Systems

ABSTRACT. Vector Lyapunov functions are a multi-dimensional extension of the more familiar (scalar) Lyapunov functions, commonly used to prove stability properties in systems described by non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). This paper explores an analogous vector extension for so-called barrier certificates used in safety verification. As with vector Lyapunov functions, the approach hinges on constructing appropriate comparison systems, i.e., related differential equation systems from which properties of the original system may be inferred. The paper presents an accessible development of the approach, demonstrates that most previous notions of barrier certificate are special cases of comparison systems, and discusses the potential applications of vector barrier certificates in safety verification and invariant synthesis.

17:30
Timed Vacuity
SPEAKER: Hana Chockler

ABSTRACT. Vacuity is a leading sanity check in model-checking, applied when the system is found to satisfy the specification. The check detects situations where the specification passes in a trivial way, say when a specification that requires every request to be followed by a grant is satisfied in a system with no requests. Such situations typically reveal serious problems in the modelling of the system or the specification, and indeed vacuity detection is a part of most industrial model-checking tools. Existing research and tools for vacuity concern discrete-time systems and specification formalisms. We introduce real-time vacuity, which aims to detect problems with real-time modelling. Real-time logics are used for the specification and verification of systems with a continuous-time behavior. We study vacuity for the branching real-time logic TCTL, and focus on vacuity with respect to the time constraints in the specification. Specifically, the logic TCTL includes a single temporal operator U^J, which specifies real-time eventualities in real-time systems: the parameter J ⊆ IR≥0 is an interval with integral boundaries that bounds the time in which the eventuality should hold. We define several tightenings for the U^J operator. These tightenings require the eventuality to hold within a strict subset of J. We prove that vacuity detection for TCTL is PSPACE-complete, thus it does not increase the complexity of model-checking of TCTL. Our contribution involves an extension, termed TCTL+, of TCTL, which allows the interval J not to be continuous, and for which model-checking stays in PSPACE. Finally, we discuss ways to rank vacuity results by their significance, and extend the framework of ranking vacuity to TCTL.

19:00-21:30 FLoC banquet at Ashmolean Museum

FLoC banquet at Ashmolean Museum. Drinks and food available from 7pm (pre-booking via FLoC registration system required; guests welcome).