L@S2021: Eighth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale Online and Face To Face Potsdam, Germany, June 22-25, 2021 |
Conference website | https://learningatscale.acm.org/las2021 |
Submission link | https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ls2021 |
Abstract registration deadline | February 8, 2021 |
Submission deadline | February 15, 2021 |
About Learning @ Scale
L@S investigates large-scale, technology-mediated learning environments that typically have many active learners and few experts on hand to guide their progress or respond to individual needs. Modern learning at scale typically draws on data at scale, collected from current learners and previous cohorts of learners over time. Large-scale learning environments are very diverse. Formal institutional education in K-16 and campus-based courses in popular fields involve many learners, relative to the number of teaching staff, and leverage varying forms of data collection and automated support. Evolving forms of massive open online courses, hybrid learning environments combining online and face-to-face, collaborative synchronous and asynchronous learning activities, distributed as mobile and seamless learning applications, intelligent learning support, AI for education. L@S invites examples of learning at scale are invited from the areas of open courseware, learning games, citizen science communities, collaborative programming communities (e.g. Scratch), community tutorial systems (e.g. StackOverflow), shared critique communities (e.g. DeviantArt), and countless informal communities of learners (e.g. the Explain It Like I’m Five sub-Reddit) are all examples of learning at scale. All share a common purpose to increase human potential, leveraging data collection, data analysis, human interaction, and varying forms of computational assessment, adaptation and guidance.
Research on learning at scale naturally brings together two different research communities. Learning scientists are drawn to study established and emerging forms of knowledge development, transfer, modelling, and co-creation. Computer and data scientists are drawn to the specific and challenging needs for data collection, data sharing, analysis, computation, and interaction. The cornerstone of L@S is interdisciplinary research and progressive confluence toward more effective and varied future learning.
The L@S research community has become increasingly sophisticated, interdisciplinary and diverse. In the early years, researchers began by investigating proxy outcomes for learning, such as measures of participation, persistence, completion, satisfaction, and activity. Early MOOC researchers in particular documented correlations between easily observed measures of activity – videos watched, forum posts, clicks – and these outcome proxies. As the field and tools mature, however, we have increasing expectations for new and established measures of learning.
Urgent Challenges and New Opportunities derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
This year, the L@S conference is specially interested in research addressing the urgent challenges derived from the COVID-19 pandemic. All learning institutions have been forced to transform and redesign their learning methods, moving from traditional models to hybrid or complete online models at scale. Teachers need best practices and evaluated instructional methods adapted to the new reality as a reference, and technological systems to assure quality education. Students require also guidelines and support for succeeding in these new learning environments as well as coaching and mentoring on learning strategies and self-regulation. All these solutions must also ensure access to equitable quality education towards a more inclusive society, pointed out as one of the key Global Challenges in the new Horizon Europe strategic plan.
In this context, and as L@S research expands, we aim for more direct measures of student learning, accompanied by generalizable insight around instructional techniques, learning habits and behaviour change, technological infrastructures, and experimental interventions that improve learning outcomes in the post-COVID-19 decade. Papers presenting ongoing work, including study designs and surveys, behavioral studies, technological solutions, aiming at understanding and discussing how the future of learning at scale will be shaped due to the COVID-19 are especially welcomed this year.
Submission
The ACM Learning at Scale conference solicits original research paper submissions on methodologies, case studies, analyses, tools, or technologies for learning at scale, broadly construed. Four kinds of contributions will be accepted: Research Papers, Synthesis Papers, Work-in-Progress Posters, Demonstrations, and Workshops. Accepted papers and posters must be presented at the conference and will be included in the proceedings. Paper submissions, reviewing and notification to authors will be handled using Easy Chair. Submissions must be in PDF format, written in English, contain original work and not be under review for any other venue while under review for this conference.
Accepted authors will have the option of presenting supplementary online materials to aid in their presentation. Presenters are encouraged to use their allotted conference time for activities or discussion in addition to delivering presentations or showing posters. We encourage best practices in open science as described in the Statement on Open Science below.
Research Papers (up to 10 pages) – Abstract due February 8, 2021, Final submission due February 15, 2021
We solicit empirical and theoretical papers on a diverse range of topics relevant to successful learning at scale. For Learning@Scale 2021, we specifically solicit work in five areas of interest to grow our community whilst being inclusive to other work: (1) Intelligence @ scale, (2) Instrucion@ scale, (3) Studies and interventions @ scale, (4) Systems & Tools at scale, and (5) Review and Synthesis papers. Accounts of robust methodologies from the learning sciences theory, practice, and/or the engineering perspectives are encouraged. Regardless of approach, strong contributions address relevance in terms of theory and practice.
Each area is represented by a community champion who can answer questions about the fit of potential submissions and who helps ensure a high-quality reviewing process in the area. The L@S 2021 areas of interest are:
- Intelligence @ Scale (Champion: Kenneth Koedinger) — Putting Artificial Intelligence models and techniques at the service of education at scale. Some of the research questions to explore are: How can AI and hybrid models help to scale learning practices? How can AI technologies be used to adapt and personalize learning at scale?
- Instruction @ Scale (Champion: Marco Kalz) — Studies that explore what aspects of instruction could be scaled up, as well as which of them are the most effective for learning. Some of the research questions to explore are: What kind of instructional design help educators to scale up learning online and in hybrid settings? How can learning make use of scaled environments and feel embedded in a learning community in an online/hybrid learning experience?
- Studies And Interventions @ Scale (Champion: René Kizilcec) — Studies that take a qualitative or mixed-methods approach to understand learners’ and teachers’ experiences and contextual factors in scaled or scalable learning environments to inform theory and/or design. Some of the research questions to explore are What are current results and data giving indications for what kind of learning support is efficient, effective and enjoyable in hybrid learning environments at scale.
- Systems and Tools @ Scale (Champion: Pedro Muñoz-Merino) — Studies that build and evaluate novel systems or tools for supporting learning scenarios at scale. Some research questions to explore are: What type of architectures do we need? or What type of processes we need to follow to scale up tools institutionally and what actors do we involve in these processes?
- Review and Synthesis papers (Champion: Yannis Dimitriadis) – To support collaboration between learning scientists, computer scientists and contributors from other relevant fields, we invite papers that evaluate, synthesize, and contextualize existing bodies of knowledge and research that may be targeted at one or more communities. Such papers may have high value to the community but might not otherwise be accepted only on the basis of original research contributions. Suitable papers include survey papers that provide useful perspectives on major research areas, papers that support or challenge long-held beliefs with compelling evidence, or papers that provide an extensive and realistic evaluation of competing approaches to solving specific problems.
Work-in-Progress (up to 4 pages) – due April 2, 2021
A Work-in-Progress (WiP) concisely summarizes recent findings or other types of innovative or thought-provoking work that has not yet reached a level of completion for a full paper. Topics are the same as for full papers. At the conference, all accepted WiP submissions will be presented in poster form. Selected WiPs may be invited for oral presentation during the conference. Rejected full-papers can be resubmitted as WiP and will be evaluated accordingly.
Demonstrations (up to 2 pages) – due April 2, 2021
Demonstrations show aspects of learning at scale in an interactive hands-on form. A live demonstration is a great opportunity to communicate ideas and concepts in a powerful way that a regular presentation cannot. We invite demonstrations of learning and analytical environments and other systems that have direct relevance to learning at scale. We especially encourage authors of accepted papers to showcase their technologies using this format. A demonstration submission should address two components:
- The merit and nature of the demonstrated technology. If the proposed demonstration is associated with a Full Paper or a WiP submission, please point to the title of the submission instead of repeating the information here.
- Details of how the demo will be executed in practice, and how visitors will interact with it during the conference.
Workshops (up to 4 pages) – due February 15, 2021
Workshops serve as a gathering place for attendees with shared interests and to build community. A workshop can be half-day or full-day, depending on the goals of the organizers.
Workshops can address any Learning @ Scale topic. In your proposal, be clear about the purpose of the workshop, who will benefit from participating, and what participants will be able to do after engaging in the workshop. Specify if the participants need to bring a laptop or other equipment to the workshop.
A workshop submission should include
Workshop proposals must not exceed 4 pages (including references) and use the CHI Proceedings Format, available in LaTeX, Word, or Overleaf. Workshop submissions are not anonymous and should therefore include all author names, affiliations and contact information. the following sections: Background, Organizers, Pre-Workshop Plans, Workshop Structure, Post-Workshop Plans, 250-word Call for Participation, References.
Author Guidelines
Different papers have different submission formats. Please, check the format of your paper:
- Research papers: Research papers must not exceed 10 pages (excluding references); papers with fewer pages are welcome. Papers must be blinded for review, and use the CHI Proceedings Format from 2020, available in LaTeX, Word, or Overleaf.
Submissions will be reviewed on the basis of originality, research quality, potential impact and value to the development of future learning at scale. In order to increase high quality papers and independent merit, the evaluation process will be double blind. The papers submitted for review MUST NOT contain the authors’ names, affiliations, or any information that may disclose the authors’ identity (this information is to be restored in the camera-ready version upon acceptance). Please replace author names and affiliations with Xs on submitted papers. In particular, in the version submitted for review please avoid explicit auto-references, such as “in [1] we show” — consider instead “in [1] it is shown”. You should cite your own relevant previous work, so that a reviewer can access it and see the new contributions. The text should not explicitly state that the cited work belongs to the authors.
- Work in progress papers: WiP submissions must not exceed 4 pages (including references) and use the CHI Proceedings Format, available in LaTeX, Word, or Overleaf. WiP submissions are not anonymous and should therefore include all author names, affiliations and contact information. If accepted, you should prepare a poster to present at the conference venue. Accepted WiP submissions are semi-archival (see details below).
- Demonstrations: Demonstration submissions must not exceed 2 pages (including references) and use the CHI Proceedings Format, available in LaTeX, Word, or Overleaf.
- Workshop: Workshop submissions must not exceed 4 pages (including references) and use the CHI Proceedings Format, available in LaTeX, Word, or Overleaf.
Statement on Open Science
Authors are encouraged to conduct their scientific inquiry using emerging best practices in open science. Authors are encouraged to preregister their study design, hypotheses, and analysis plans, and publish these using platforms such as OSF.io or AsPredicted.org. Whenever possible, feasible, and ethical, authors are encouraged to make their data, materials, and scripts openly available for inspection, replication, and follow-up analysis. The best way to share these materials is to use an established platform like OSF.io.
Archival Proceedings
Research and synthesis papers will appear in the conference proceedings published by the ACM Press in the ACM Digital Library. Work-in-Progress and Demonstration papers will appear in a separate part of the conference proceedings. The status of Work-in-Progress paper will be akin to what Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) Conference describes as “semi-archival”, meaning the results reported in the Work-in-Progress paper must be original, but copyright is retained by the authors and the material can be used as the basis for future publications in ACM venues as long as there are significant revisions from the original. Proceedings and conference statistics from prior years are available online.
OpenAccess to Proceedings
The official publication date is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM Digital Library. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of your conference. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work. (For those rare conferences whose proceedings are published in the ACM Digital Library after the conference is over, the official publication date remains the first day of the conference).
Programme Committee
Programme Chairs:
- Amy Ogan (Carnegie Mellon, US)
- Mar Pérez-Sanagustín (Paul Sabatier University Toulouse III, France)
- Marcus Specht (TU Delft, Leiden University, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands)
General Chair:
- Christoph Meinel (Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering Potsdam, Germany)
Local Arrangements Chairs:
Thomas Staubitz, Stefanie Schweiger (Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering Potsdam, Germany)
Programme Committee: TBA