CEM2017: COMMODITY AND ENERGY MARKETS 2017
PROGRAM FOR THURSDAY, JUNE 15TH
Days:
previous day
all days

View: session overviewtalk overview

09:00-10:30 Session 4A: Commodity Futures Markets
Chair:
Jaime Casassus (Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile)
Location: L5
09:00
Yannick Le Pen (Université Paris-Dauphine, France)
Benoît Sévi (Université de Nantes, France)
Futures trading and the excess co-movement of commodity prices
DISCUSSANT: Jaime Casassus

ABSTRACT. We empirically reinvestigate the issue of the excess co-movement of commodity prices initially raised in Pindyck and Rotemberg (1990). Excess co-movement appears when commodity prices remain correlated even after adjusting for the impact of fundamentals. We use recent developments in large approximate factor models to consider a richer information set and adequately model these fundamentals. We consider a set of eight unrelated commodities along with 184 real and nominal macroeconomic variables, from developed and emerging economies, from which nine factors are extracted over the 1993-2013 period. Our estimates provide evidence of time-varying excess co-movement which is only occasionally significant. We further show that speculative intensity is a driver of the estimated excess co-movement, as speculative trading is both correlated across the commodity futures markets and correlated with the futures prices. Our results can be taken as direct evidence of the significant impact of financialization on commodity-price cross-moments.

09:30
Jaime Casassus (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile)
Spanned and Unspanned Risks in Commodity Futures Markets
DISCUSSANT: John Fan

ABSTRACT. In this paper we borrow recent advances from the fixed income literature, to study the dynamics of futures prices. From a time-series perspective, ours is a study of commodity risk premiums across contract maturities, while form a cross sectional point of view, our work can be understood as a study of convenience yields.

Joslin, Singleton and coauthors have developed a new approach to deal with Dynamic Term Structure Models (DTSM). This consisted basically in the rotation of the latent factor model to another one based on observable variables (a portfolio of bonds of different maturities). These authors have studies DTSM models i) with only observables, ii) with observables and macroeconomic factors that are spanned from the term structure of interest rates, and ii) with observables and unspanned macroeconomic factors. Unspanned factors means that these are not bond pricing factors, however, they appear in the pricing kernel, therefore, that can drive the risk premia of the observables.

We adapt and implement all these innovations to the study of commodity futures prices. In our empirical work, we collect several variables related to commodity markets and the macroeconomy. In particular, we focus on crude oil futures and as risk premia determinants we use the stock market return, economic growth, inflation, exchange rate changes, default spread, term spread, and commodity-specific variable, such as, hedging pressure and inventory.

In our preliminary results we find only weak evidence of spanning, since at most the first three PC of crude oil log futures prices explain 31.6\% of variation in inventories. In consequence, three factor models including a non futures risk factor with spanned macro risk do a poor job fitting the observed PC compared to a model with three futures risk factors. In light of these results, the unspanned macro risk hypothesis was tested. We estimate four factor models with the first three PC as pricing factors. We obtained only weak evidence supporting a relationship between crude oil futures risk premia and stock market returns.

10:00
John Fan (Griffith University, Australia)
Microscopic Momentum in Commodity Futures
SPEAKER: John Fan
DISCUSSANT: Yannick Le Pen

ABSTRACT. This paper proposes a more granular momentum strategy termed ‘microscopic momentum’, which decomposes the 12-month conventional momentum into single-month components. The novel decomposition reveals a persistent seasonality effect in the cross-section of commodity futures returns. An investment strategy that exploits the seasonal pattern generates statistically significant economic profits after controlling for standard, commodity-specific risk and behavioral factors. We show that the cross-sectional seasonality documented is not driven by transaction costs, particular commodity sectors or month-of-year seasonality effects, but appears to be related to commodities hedging pressure. Furthermore, our findings suggest that conventional momentum profits in commodity futures can be grounded within a risk-based framework of term structure and hedging pressure factors after controlling for the cross-sectional seasonality.

09:00-10:30 Session 4B: Renewables and Electricity Markets
Chair:
Luca Taschini (London School of Economics, UK)
Location: C2
09:00
Maria Eugenia Sanin (Univ. Evry, Université Paris-Saclay and Ecole Polytechnique, France)
Optimal feed-in-tariffs for Household Photovoltaic Panels in France
DISCUSSANT: Michael Coulon

ABSTRACT. Photovoltaic (PV) technology has importantly increased in the last few years generating an important policy debate on the various incentive measures (feed-in-tari¤s or FiT, R&D subsidies, tradable green certi…- cates, renewable portfolio standard, net metering) coupled with the Eu- ropean 2030 target (27% share of renewable energy consumption) and in our case study, with the 2030 objectives of the French "Transition Energetique" (40% of energy consumption must be renewable).Indeed, feed-in tari¤s for PV in France have had their ups and downs following several changes of heart of the regulatory authority. Indeed, at the end of 2010, the moratorium froze the photovoltaic market in France by sus- pending subsidies and connections to grid network of ongoing projects except for small installations with power below 3 kWp, i.e. household installations. Some papers have tried to understand the extent of PV deployment considering its main drivers. The seminal works of Shae¤er et al. 2004, Nemet, 2006 Pillai 2015 and Rubin 2015 consider as the main driver the learning e¤ect of installed capacity. The limits regarding this liter- ature is that results are very sensitive to data and the fact that there may be factors other than learning that are also playing a role. Then, other papers have focused on deployment where the di¤usion of inno- vation is often described by a logistic function or "S-curves" (see Bass model-Gerowski, 2000, Guidolin and Mortarino, 2010). Such models, despite being insightful, do not take into account the incentive policies such as subsidies and feed-in tari¤s. Finally, papers like Dusonchet and Telaretti, 2010 or Zhang and Hamori, 2011 consider the pro…tability of PV investment across Europe, Japan, Germany, etc. in presence of in- centives schemes but they do not consider the long-run targets that are behind the choice of those incentives. In this paper we contribute to the previous literature by answering the following research questions: Do we really need Feed In Tari¤s (FIT) for French residential con- sumers/producers? The reply to the previous question depends on the answer we give to the following question: is the trend in the installation price of panels exogenous or is there a learning-by-doing e¤ect in France?

09:30
Michael Coulon (University of Sussex, UK)
Javad Khazaei (Princeton University, USA)
Warren Powell (Princeton University, USA)
ADAPT: A Price-stabilizing Compliance Policy for Renewable Energy Certificates
DISCUSSANT: Awdesch Melzer

ABSTRACT. Currently most Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) markets (or green certificates) are defined based on targets which create an artificial step demand function resembling a cliff. This target policy produces volatile prices which can make investing in renewables a risky proposition. In this paper, we propose an alternative policy called Adjustable Dynamic Assignment of Penalties and Targets (ADAPT) which uses a sloped compliance penalty and a self-regulating requirement schedule, both designed to stabilize REC prices, helping to alleviate a common weakness of environmental markets. To capture market behavior, we model the market as a stochastic dynamic programming problem to understand how the market might balance the decision to use a REC now versus holding it for future periods (in the face of uncertain new supply). Then, we present and prove some of the properties of this market, and finally we show how this mechanism reduces the volatility of REC prices which can stabilize the market and encourage long-term investment in renewables.

10:00
Awdesch Melzer (Humboldt-University Berlin, Germany)
Wolfgang Haerdle (HU Berlin, Germany)
Brenda López Cabrera (Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany)
Pricing Green Financial Products
DISCUSSANT: Maria Eugenia

ABSTRACT. With increasing wind power penetration more and more volatile and weather dependent energy is fed into the German electricity system. To manage the risk of windless days and transfer the risk of unstable revenue stream from wind turbine owners to third parties wind power derivatives were introduced. These insurance-like contracts allow to hedge the risk of unstable wind power production at turbine location on exchanges like Nasdaq, European Energy Exchange. We present a new method to model weather derivatives with very skewed data incorporating extreme events in modelling seasonal volatility and compare with common approaches of Benth et al. (2009) and Weron (2011) in transformed Gaussian and pure non-Gaussian CARMA(p, q) models. Our results indicate that our transformed Gaussian CARMA(p, q) model is preferred over the non-Gaussian alternative with Lévy increments. The calibration of the empirical market price of risk shows typical behaviour for futures and forwards in electricity markets.

09:00-10:30 Session 4C: Forecasting in Commodity Markets
Chair:
Chardin Wese (ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, UK)
Location: C3
09:00
Steven Jordan (Alfaisal University, Saudi Arabia)
Andrew Vivian (Loughborough University, UK)
Mark Wohar (University of Nebraska at Omaha and Loughborough University, USA)
Stock Returns Forecasting with Metals: Sentiment vs. Fundamentals
SPEAKER: Andrew Vivian
DISCUSSANT: Björn Tharann

ABSTRACT. Using six prominent metal commodities, we provide evidence on the out-of-sample forecasting of stock returns for the market indices of the G7 countries, for which there is little prior evidence in this context. We find precious metals (Gold and Silver) can improve forecast accuracy relative to the benchmark and performs well compared to forecast combinations. From an economic gains perspective, forecasting returns provides certainty equivalent gains in a market-timing strategy for the G7 countries. These certainty equivalent gains are large enough to make active portfolio management attractive, even for individual investors. Gains remain after considering reasonable transaction costs.

09:30
Marcel Prokopczuk (Leibniz University Hannover, Germany)
Björn Tharann (Leibniz University Hannover, Germany)
Chardin Wese Simen (University of Reading, UK)
The Predictability of Commodity Returns and Volatility
DISCUSSANT: Joelle Miffre

ABSTRACT. A growing literature, e.g., Gorton & Rouwenhorst (2006), Gargano & Timmermann (2014) and Barunk & Krehlk (2016), analyzes several variables that are known to have predictive ability for stocks and documents predictive power also for commodity excess returns and volatility. The growing number of predictive variables raises several questions: Which variables known to predict stock excess returns can also predict commodity excess returns? Do the variables that predict commodity excess returns also forecast commodity volatility? These are some of the questions we want to study.

10:00
Adrian Fernandez-Perez (Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand)
Ana-Maria Fuertes (Cass Business School, City, University of London, UK)
Joelle Miffre (EDHEC Business School, France)
An Integrated Harvest of Commodity Risk Premia
SPEAKER: Joelle Miffre
DISCUSSANT: Andrew Vivian

ABSTRACT. The literature has established that the risk premia of commodity futures can be captured using roll-yield, past performance, hedging pressure or volatility signals, inter alia. Rather than confronting all the available signals to choose an optimal one, we propose to integrate them by allocating wealth to the commodities that most signals recommend to take positions on. Our results indicate that, despite its simplicity, the proposed approach is very effective at capturing the risk premia of commodity futures, and performs better than alternative integration approaches based on principal components or utility maximization. These findings are robust to the use of both front-end and spreading returns, are corroborated by cross-sectional tests, sustain relatively small transaction costs and are not driven by data mining.

09:00-10:30 Session 4D: Modelling Commodities and Power prices
Chair:
Ruediger Kiesel (University Duisburg-Essen, Germany)
Location: L2
09:00
Agostino Capponi (Columbia University, USA)
Humoud Alsabah (Columbia University, USA)
Multi-Market Dynamic Oligopoly with Inventory
DISCUSSANT: Audun Sætherø

ABSTRACT. We study a dynamic Cournot model of competition between firms for a single homogeneous good. The market is divided into several geographical regions, each having its own demand and market price. The competition spans over several time periods. Both buyers and sellers can produce inventory in a period and use it in subsequent periods. Our analysis highlights that heterogeneity in the firms' shipping costs plays a major role for price formation and price disparities across regions. We shows that there exists a unique subgame perfect equilibrium allocation plan for inventory and product distribution, in which each firm sells a positive quantity in each period. We illustrate the power of our framework on the market of fertilizers.

09:30
Audun Sætherø (University Duisburg-Essen, Germany)
Rüdiger Kiesel (University Duisburg-Essen, Germany)
Florentina Paraschiv (NTNU, Norway)
On the Construction of Hourly Price Forward Curves for Electricity Prices
DISCUSSANT: Clemence Alasseur

ABSTRACT. There are several approaches in the literature for the derivation of price forward curves (PFCs) which distinguish among each other by the procedure employed for the derivation of seasonality shapes, smoothing technique and by the design of the optimization procedure. However, a comparative study to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different methods is missing. For the construction of PFCs we typically incorporate the information about market expectation from the observed futures prices and the deterministic seasonal effects of electricity prices. In most existing approaches, the seasonality shape is historically derived and it is an exogenous input to the optimization procedure. As seasonal effects on electricity prices differ between markets, our model allows a more general and flexible definition of the seasonality shape. In this study, we propose an alternative calibration procedure for the seasonality shape, where the level of futures as well as historical spot prices are simultaneously taken into account in a joint optimization approach. We discuss comparatively the features of existing methods for PFCs and highlight the advantages of our optimization procedure.

10:00
Clemence Alasseur (EDF R&D FIME, France)
Imen Ben Tahar (Dauphine University, France)
Anis Matoussi (Le Mans Univeristy, France)
Mean Field Game and local storages in the power system
DISCUSSANT: Humoud Alsabah

ABSTRACT. We consider a stylized model for a power system with distributed local energy generation and micro-storage. The aim of each agent is to minimize his own cost of electricity consumption by controlling the size and the management of its own storage device. We consider non-cooperative game setting that leads to the analysis of a non-zero sum stochastic game with $N$ players and to the search of Nash-equilibria. In a linear quadratic setting, we are able to give explicit solutions for the storage management and to link the implied extended Mean-Field Game to Mean-Field type control problem.

09:00-10:30 Session 4E: Swings and Storage
Chair:
Isabel Figuerola-Ferretti (ICADEUniversidad Pointificia Comillas, Spain)
Location: C1
09:00
Veronika Lunina (Lund University, Sweden)
Joint Modelling of Power Price, Temperature, and Hydrological Balance with a View towards Scenario Analysis
DISCUSSANT: Edward Kao

ABSTRACT. This study presents a model for the joint dynamics of power price, temperature, and hydrological balance, with a view towards scenario analysis. Temperature is a major demand-side factor affecting power prices, while hydrobalance is a major supply-side factor in power markets dominated by hydrological generation, such as the Nordic market. Our time series modelling approach coupled with the skew-Student distribution allows for interrelations in both mean and volatility, and accommodates most of the discovered empirical features, such as periodic patterns and long memory. We find that in the Nordic market, the relationship between temperature and power price is driven by the demand for heating, while the cooling effect during summer months does not exist. Hydrobalance, on the other hand, negatively affects power prices throughout the year. We demonstrate how the proposed model can be used to generate a variety of joint temperature/hydrobalance scenarios and analyse the implications for power price.

09:30
Edward Kao (University of Houston, USA)
Muhu Wang (Dynergy, USA)
A Finite Element Method for Pricing Swing Options under Stochastic Volatility
SPEAKER: Edward Kao
DISCUSSANT: Veronika Lunina

ABSTRACT. This paper studies the pricing of a swing option under stochastic volatility. We propose an algorithm based on the finite element method to price put options under a Black-Scholes-Merton paradigm with stochastic volatility. We show the approach is accurate and efficient.

09:00-10:30 Session 4F: Financialization of Commodities
Chair:
Devraj Basu (University of Strathclyde,, UK)
Location: L1
09:00
Devraj Basu (University of Strathclyde,, UK)
Financialization and Commodity Price Volatility
SPEAKER: Devraj Basu
DISCUSSANT: Thore Kockerols

ABSTRACT. This paper studies the impact of financialization on commodity futures return distributions. Over the period associated with financialization, we find shifts in the nature of volatility across the entire cross-section of commodities and shifts in the nature of the entire returns distribution across the agricultural and metals sectors. The effeects of financialization appear to be the most profound on the metal sector and the altered nature of the metals return distributions appears to have transmitted itself to the mining sector, leading to simultaneous increases in capital expenditures which may have contributed to the recent value destruction in this sector.

09:30
Thore Kockerols (Universite Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, Germany)
Financialisation and the aluminium market Evidence from a DSGE model
DISCUSSANT: Maria Kartsakli

ABSTRACT. This paper investigates the extend and impact of financialisation on the aluminium market. I test the hypothesis that the inflow in commodity linked financial products led to banks being more integrated in financial markets and eventually abusing their market power to manipulate prices. This hypothesis is tested by identifying a corresponding storage demand shock using a structural model of the US economy with aluminium used in production. This dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model includes storage and frictions representing warehouse queues. The model is estimated on data for the US from 1987 to 2008 and the frictions representing warehouse queues are found to be significant. Furthermore, monetary policy has a secondary transmission channel in a model with storage. The results suggest that financialisation played a role in explaining aluminium market dynamics leading up to 2008 and had a negative impact on the economy.

10:00
Maria Kartsakli (University of St.Gallen, Switzerland)
Zeno Adams (University of St.Gallen, Switzerland)
Has Crude Oil Become a Financial Asset? Evidence from Ten Years of Financialization
DISCUSSANT: Devraj Basu

ABSTRACT. The financialization of crude oil markets over the last decade has changed the behavior of oil prices in fundamental ways. In this paper, we uncover the gradual transformation of crude oil from a physical to a financial asset. Although economic demand and supply factors continue to play an important role, recent indicators associated with financialization have emerged since 2008. We show that financial variables have become the main driving factors explaining the variation in crude oil returns and volatility today. Our findings have important implications for portfolio analysis and for the effectiveness of hedging in crude oil markets.

10:30-11:00Coffee Break
11:00-12:30 Session 5A: Commodity Risk Pricing
Chair:
Joelle Miffre (EDHEC Business School, France)
Location: L5
11:00
Hossein Rad (UQ Business School, Australia)
Rand Low (UQ Business School, Australia)
Joelle Miffre (EDHEC Business School, France)
Robert Faff (US Business School, Australia)
How do portfolio weighting schemes affect commodity futures risk premia?
SPEAKER: Hossein Rad
DISCUSSANT: Marcel Prokopczuk

ABSTRACT. We examine whether and to what extent successful equities investment strategies are transferrable to the commodities futures market. We investigate a total of 7 investment strategies that involve optimization and mean-variance timing techniques. To account for the unique characteristics of the commodity futures market, we propose a novel method of classification based on momentum or term structure properties in the formation of long-short portfolios in conjunction with the quantitative strategies from the equities literature. Our approach generates significant excess returns and risk-adjusted performances as measured by the Sharpe and Sortino ratios and the maximum drawdown. We find no significant correlation between the strategies excess returns and common risk factors. There is no evidence that excess returns are a compensation for liquidity risk. The strategies are robust to transaction costs and choice of model parameters and exhibit stable performance across various market conditions including times of financial crisis.

11:30
Raphael Paschke (University of Mannheim, Germany)
Marcel Prokopczuk (Leibniz University Hannover, Germany)
Chardin Wese (University of Reading, UK)
Curve Momentum
DISCUSSANT: Paola Zerilli

ABSTRACT. We introduce the curve momentum strategy that operates within commodity futures curves. The curve momentum strategy, diversified across all markets, generates significantly positive average returns and a (annualized) Sharpe ratio of 1.28. This performance cannot be explained by exposure to the conventional carry and momentum strategies that operate primarily across (rather than within) commodity futures curves. The performance of the curve momentum strategy is difficult to reconcile with existing behavioral, limits-to-arbitrage and rational asset pricing theories that have been largely developed to explain the conventional momentum effect.

12:00
Paola Zerilli (University of York, UK)
Christopher Baum (Boston College, USA)
A continuous time CAPM for crude oil futures with stochastic volatility: GMM analysis
SPEAKER: Paola Zerilli
DISCUSSANT: Hossein Rad

ABSTRACT. We propose a stochastic volatility CAPM model for commodity futures in continuous time. We implement the model using high-frequency intraday data from the crude oil and S&P500 futures markets for the October 2001--December 2012 period. We estimate this model with a simple GMM estimator that matches sample moments of the realized volatility to the corresponding population moments of the integrated volatility. We find evidence of a significant inpact of the S&P500 futures on crude oil futures.

11:00-12:30 Session 5B: Fish Market Analysis
Chair:
Sjur Westgaard (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Location: C2
11:00
Bård Misund (University of Stavanger Business School, Norway)
Atle Oglend (University of Stavanger, Norway)
Volatility Spill-overs in Salmon Aquaculture Markets
SPEAKER: Bård Misund
DISCUSSANT: Kristian Sandaker

ABSTRACT. This study investigates the volatility dynamics in the market for fresh-farmed Atlantic salmon. Previous studies suggest that there has been a shift, in the beginning of the 2000s, in terms of the drivers for wholesale salmon prices. Research shows that as the industry has matured, salmon prices have gone from being productivity-driven to being input factor driven, i.e. increasingly being determined by prices of agricultural products which are used in fish feed. At around the same time, salmon price volatility has more than doubled, possibly linked to an increase in food prices. In this study, we investigate whether the increased dependence of salmon wholesale prices on agricultural food prices is also evident as volatility spill-overs from agricultural prices to salmon prices, and whether we can find any structural shifts in the volatility spill-over. The results will be of interest to salmon producers in their hedging decisions for both input factor prices and wholesale salmon prices.

11:30
Sjur Westgaard (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Kristian Sandaker (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Frank Asche (University of Florida, USA)
Paal Olav Warbo Mjaugeto (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Kjartan Berge Steinshamn (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Forecasting the Atlantic Salmon Spot Price Using a General-to-Specific Regression Approach
DISCUSSANT: Peter Schütz

ABSTRACT. Accurate models for forecasting of the salmon price can support operational considerations such as inventory management and harvest timing, as well as financial aspects such as investment decisions, risk management, and trading. In this paper, a general-to-specific regression approach is applied in a twofold way: At first, to determine the most important factors that affect the Atlantic salmon spot price, represented by the Fish Pool Index (FPI), and, secondly, to provide short-term spot price forecasts. The forward selection procedure is employed to determine the best in-sample subsets of 37 different explanatory variables, as well as their lagged versions, across time increments of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. Based on these determined subsets, the corresponding regression models are applied out-of-sample to provide one-step-ahead forecasts. The best set of forecasting models, consisting of five variables, provide favourable predictions. In particular, the out-of-sample forecast error is half that of the random walk.

12:00
Peter Schütz (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Sjur Westgaard (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway)
Optimal hedging strategies for salmon producers
SPEAKER: Peter Schütz
DISCUSSANT: Bård Misund

ABSTRACT. We present a multistage stochastic programming model for determining the optimal hedging strategy for salmon producers. The objective is to maximize expected profits selling salmon either in the spot market or in forward contracts. The decisions are subject to constraints on conditional value-at-risk.

11:00-12:30 Session 5C: Coordination, Auctions, and Policy
Chair:
Juan Ignacio Peña (Universidad Carlos III, Spain)
Location: C3
11:00
Juan Ignacio Peña (Universidad Carlos III, Spain)
Rosa Rodriguez (Universidad Carlos III, Spain)
Default Supply Auctions in Electricity Markets: Challenges and Proposals
DISCUSSANT: Daniel Jiang

ABSTRACT. We study consequences of default supply auctions in electricity markets on premiums over spot prices obtained by winning bidders, and on speculation and hedging activities in power derivatives markets. We use data from sixty-four default supply auctions, those of (CESUR) in the Spanish Electricity Market from 2007 to 2013, and those of Basic Generation Service auctions (PJM-BGS) in New Jersey's PJM market from 2006 to 2015. Winning bidders obtained an average yearly premium of 10.15% (CESUR) and 112% (PJM-BGS) in excess of electricity spot prices. Premiums and number of bidders are negatively related. In CESUR, hedging-driven trading in power derivatives markets is predominant around auction dates, but in PJM-BGS, speculation-driven trading prevails. Thus, we detect two major challenges to default supply auctions, high ex-post premium and unintended speculative trading. As alternatives to default supply auctions, we evaluate the performance of several methods. The key factor in this regard is consumer’s aversion to price volatility. If consumers are not averse to price volatility, best methods are based on daily wholesale prices. However, as aversion to price volatility increases, methods based on prices of liquid electricity swap contracts become preferable to consumers.

11:30
Daniel Jiang (University of Pittsburgh, USA)
Warren Powell (Princeton University, USA)
Optimal Policies for Risk-Averse Electric Vehicle Charging with Spot Purchases
SPEAKER: Daniel Jiang
DISCUSSANT: Rene Aid

ABSTRACT. We consider the sequential decision problem faced by the manager of an electric vehicle (EV) charging station, who aims to satisfy the charging demand of the customer while minimizing cost. Since the total time needed to charge the EV up to capacity is typically less than the amount of time that the customer is away, there are opportunities to exploit electricity spot price variations within some time window. However, it is also true that the return time of the customer is uncertain, so there exists the risk of an insufficient charge. We formulate the problem as a finite horizon Markov decision process (MDP) and consider a risk–averse objective function by optimizing under a dynamic risk measure constructed using a convex combination of expected value and conditional value at risk (CVaR). For the first time in the literature, we provide an analysis of the effect that risk parameters, e.g., the risk–level α used in CVaR, have on the structure of the optimal policy. We show that becoming more risk–averse in the dynamic risk measure sense corresponds to the intuitively appealing notion of becoming more risk–averse in the order thresholds of the optimal policy. This result allows us to develop computational techniques for approximating a spectrum of risk–averse policies generated by varying the parameters of the risk measure. Finally, numerical results for a case study using spot price data from California ISO (CAISO) are shown, where the Pareto optimality of our policies when measured against practical metrics of risk and reward is examined.

12:00
Rene Aid (Université Paris Dauphine, France)
The coordination of centralised and distributed generation
SPEAKER: Rene Aid
DISCUSSANT: Juan Ignacio Peña

ABSTRACT. This paper analyses the interaction between centralised carbon emissive technologies and distributed intermittent non-emissive technologies. In our model, there is a representative consumer who can satisfy her electricity demand by investing in distributed generation (solar panels) and by buying power to a centralised firm at a price he set up. Distributed generation is intermittent and induces an externality cost to the consumer. The firm provides non-random electricity generation subject to carbon price and to transmission costs. The objective of the consumer is to satisfy her demand while minimising investment costs, payment to the firm and intermittency cost. The objective of the firm is to satisfy consumer's residual demand while minimising investment costs, demand deviation costs and maximising payment from the consumer. Investment decisions are formulated as McKean-Vlasov control problems with stochastic coefficients. We provide explicit, model-free solutions to the optimal decision problems faced by each player, the solution of the Pareto optimum and the Stackelberg equilibrium where the firm is the leader. We find that, from the social planner point of view, carbon price or transmission costs are necessary to justify a positive share of distributed capacity in the long-term, whatever the respective investment costs of both technologies are. The Stackelberg equilibrium is far from the Pareto equilibrium, leading to a much larger share of distributed energy and to a much higher price for centralised energy. Joint work with Matteo Basei, Imen Ben Tahar and Huyên Pham.

11:00-12:30 Session 5D: Commodities and Expected Returns
Chair:
Etienne Borocco (Université Paris Dauphine, France)
Location: C1
11:00
John Cotter (Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School, University College Dublin, Ireland)
Emmanuel Eyiah-Donkor (Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School, University College Dublin, Ireland)
Valerio Poti (Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School, University College Dublin, Ireland)
The economic value of commodities in asset allocation when returns are predictable
DISCUSSANT: Etienne Borocco

ABSTRACT. We evaluate the out-of-sample performance of commodities in portfolios composed of stocks, bonds, and T-bills. The evidence on their ability to generate economic value is mixed, with previous studies ignoring the potential role of asset return predictability, and the states of the business cycle. Using monthly data over the period 1976-2015, we document sizeable utility gains for a mean-variance investor who exploits predictability in asset returns. For example, an investor with moderate level of risk aversion, who imposes sensible restrictions on portfolio weights, can generate net-of-transactions-costs utility gains of over 130 basis points per annum. In addition, we find strong influence of the business cycle, as dated by the National Bureau of Economic Research, on portfolio performance. During the recessionary phase of the business cycle, commodities are shown to generate substantial utility gains of over 1338 basis points per annum. In expansionary periods of the business cycle, however, commodities do not add economic value generating utility losses of over 50 basis points. These findings suggest that the ability of commodities to improve portfolio performance is countercyclical. Our findings are robust to varying levels of risk aversion, portfolio weight constraints, transactions costs and alternative performance metrics.

11:30
Etienne Borocco (Université Paris Dauphine, France)
The implications of an informationally efficient futures market.

ABSTRACT. The financialization of the commodity markets would have two effects. The first one is a liquidity effect, more speculators bring more liquidity. The second one is an informational effect, speculators come with their information which is more or less noisy. A burning issue is the consequences of these two effects on the physical market because of the feedback of the derivatives market. We decided to extend Ekeland et al. (2014) with information asymmetry. The core of both models is the same. This paper redefines what is an efficient market with a hedging pressure. Two theorems which generalize the fully-revealing rational expectations equilibrium with a linear hedging pressure are demonstrated. The empirical implications are strong. The spot price is predictable only by the futures price in a one-factor model. Moreover, noisy signals make the risk premium stochastic. They are consequences from the stochastic informational effect that we distinguish from the deterministic physical effect.

11:00-12:30 Session 5E: Commodities and Stock Markets
Chair:
Roméo Tédongap (ESSEC Business School, France)
Location: L1
11:00
Patrick Augustin (McGill University, Canada)
Roméo Tédongap (ESSEC Business School, France)
Disappointment Aversion, Term Structure, and Predictability Puzzles in Bond Markets
DISCUSSANT: Jingzhen Liu

ABSTRACT. We solve a dynamic general equilibrium model with generalized disappointment aversion preferences and continuous state endowment dynamics. We apply the framework to the term structure of interest rates and show that the model generates an upward sloping term structure of nominal interest rates, a downward sloping term structure of real interest rates, and that it accounts for the failure of the expectations hypothesis. The key ingredients are disappointment aversion preferences, preference for early resolution of uncertainty, and an endowment economy with three state variables: time-varying macroeconomic uncertainty, time-varying expected inflation and inflation uncertainty.

11:30
Jingzhen Liu (The University of Aberdeen, UK)
Forecasting the sign of U.S. oil and gas industry stock index excess returns by using macroeconomic variables
SPEAKER: Jingzhen Liu
DISCUSSANT: Panos Markou

ABSTRACT. In this study, we construct static and dynamic probit models to forecast the monthly excess return signs of U.S. oil and gas industry index by mining a big macroeconomic variable dataset which is made by McCracken and Ng (2015). Three different information criteria and a Forward Sequential Selection algorithm are used to select the most ”important” macroeconomic variables for prediction. Our results show that Durable Materials Industrial Production and Real Estate Loans at All Commercial Banks are two important predictors. Specifically, the growth of Durable Materials Industrial Production and the increasing growth speed of Real Estate Loans at All Commercial Banks can increase the probability of positive sign of excess stock returns for US oil and gas industry. In-sample and out-of-sample results show that Static-AIC model with 14 macroeconomic variables has better forecasting performance than other models chosen by BIC and HQC criteria. The active trading strategies based on the Static-AIC model can improve the Sharpe ratio of buy-and-hold strategy and the two cases(with and without transaction costs) are compared. The forecasting ability of the Static-AIC model is robust to different industry classification systems.

12:00
Panos Markou (University of Cambridge, UK)
Ryan Williams (University of Arizona, USA)
Jie Yang (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, USA)
Bank Lines of Credit and Corporate Collateral
SPEAKER: Ryan Williams
DISCUSSANT: Roméo Tédongap

ABSTRACT. We examine the effect of collateral on firms' bank lines of credit. Although the average firm experiences a negative liquidity shock during the recent financial crisis, the concurrent increase in gold prices provides a positive shock to the collateral value of gold firms. Using this natural experiment, we find that gold firms experience better access to credit lines during the crisis period relative to non-gold firms. This effect is unique to firms who are not hedging price risk and are, therefore, most exposed to the positive price shock to gold. We also document the above collateral channel using two-stage least squares and report similar results with net debt issuances.

11:00-12:30 Session 5F: Oil Risk II
Chair:
Steffen Hitzemann (The Ohio State University, USA)
Location: L2
11:00
Francesco Picciolo (University of Siena, Italy)
Valerio Gemmetto (Leiden University, Netherlands)
Franco Ruzzenenti (Parthenope University of Naples, Italy)
A network analysis of the global energy market before the oil shock: an insight on the entanglement between crude oil and world economy
DISCUSSANT: Steffen Hitzemann

ABSTRACT. In 2014 17% of exports in the World was energy, the largest part, oil. The structural role of oil goes far beyond its share in trade and can only be understood by looking at interactions globally. The role of oil compared to the other three energy commodities -coal, gas and electricity, in shaping the world trade web (WTW) is addressed by means of network theory. Three main measures are taken into account: the ratio of mutual exchanges (reciprocity); the role of distances in trade patterns (spatial filling); and the correlation of energy commodities with the WTW and with four trading categories: food, capital goods, intermediate goods and consumption goods. The analysis delivers five main results:1) the energy commodities network was structurally stable amid dramatic growth during the decade considered; 2) oil is the most correlated energy commodity to the world trade web; 3) oil is the most pervasive network, though coal is the less affected by distances; 4) oil has a remarkably high level of internal reciprocity, higher than most of any other commodity traded in the world; 5) the reciprocity of the trade network is negative correlated in time with the price of oil, regardless of global imbalance.

11:30
Steffen Hitzemann (The Ohio State University, USA)
Amir Yaron (University of Pennsylvania, USA)
Welfare Costs of Oil Shocks
DISCUSSANT: Lin Gao

ABSTRACT. This paper investigates the costs of oil shocks for the economy's welfare. Using a VECM, we empirically show that domestic US oil production shocks only have a weak and temporary impact on macroeconomic variables, while the effect of global oil price shocks is persistent and economically and statistically significant. We rationalize these findings within a calibrated two-sector model in which oil is an input factor for industrial production and also part of the household's consumption bundle. Based on the model, we show that oil shocks are associated with large welfare costs for oil-importing economies. Our framework enables several experiments regarding the welfare implications of a reduced oil share in production and consumption, the strategic petroleum reserve, and technological innovations such as fracking.

12:00
Michael Brandt (Duke University, USA)
Lin Gao (University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Macro Fundamentals or Geopolitical Events? A Textual Analysis of News Events for Crude Oil
SPEAKER: Lin Gao
DISCUSSANT: Franco Ruzzenenti

ABSTRACT. News about macroeconomic fundamentals and geopolitical events affect crude oil markets differently. Using sentiment scores for a broad set of global news of different types, we find that news related to macro fundamentals have an impact on the oil price in the short run and significantly predict oil returns in the long run. Geopolitical news have a much stronger immediate impact but exhibit not predictability. Moreover, geopolitical news generate more uncertainty and greater trading volume, consistent with a disagreement explanation, while macroeconomic news reduce informational asymmetry and are associated with subsequent lower trading volume. Finally, we find that news sentiment contains more information about future expectations than about future realizations of economic data.

12:30-13:30Lunch Break
13:30-15:00 Session 6A: Bubbles in Commodity Markets
Chair:
Sofia Ramos (ESSEC, France)
Location: L2
13:30
Isabel Figuerola-Ferretti (ICADEUniversidad Pointificia Comillas, Spain)
Ramon Bermejo (ICADE Universidad Pointificia Comillas, Spain)
Rod McCrorie (Economics Deparment St Andrews, UK)
Ioannis Paraskevopoulos (Capital Markets, Bankia, Spain)
Gonzalo Suarez (ICADE Universidad Pointificia Comillas, Spain)
Bubble migration across asset classes during the global financial crises

ABSTRACT. This paper uses the new, mildly explosive/multiple bubbles technique proposed by Phillips, Shi and Yu (2015, International Economic Review 56(4), 1043-1133) and the bubble migration hypothesis applied in Phillips and Yu (2011) International Economic Review to analyse the time series behaviour of a number of key financial variables during the global financial crises. We focus on the Dry Baltic Index as the main gauge of the state of the economy and find that it exhibits explosive behaviour at the end of the 2007 coinciding with the collapse of the home price bubble. We additionally document subsequent mildly explosive episodes in credit risk CDS portfolios and commodity prices. Eventually, as the crisis unfolds bubbles are reflected in the real economy as exhibited by the mild explosivity documented in US jobless claims just before the Lehman´s episode. Our framework is embedded under the sequential model proposed by Caballero, Farhi and Gourinchas (2008) (CFG) which episodes how bubble creation and collapse migrate across markets, from the U.S. subprime market, through certain commodities markets to the U.S. bond market. In this paper we contribute to the literature by testing for mild explosivity and bubble migration using a wider set of key financial variables than previously analysed in the literature subsequetnly testing the CFG migration hypothesis.

14:00
Rajkumar Janardanan (SummerHaven Investment Management, USA)
Xiao Qiao (SummerHaven Investment Management, USA)
Geert Rouwenhorst (Yale School of Management, USA)
On Commodity Price Limits
SPEAKER: Xiao Qiao
DISCUSSANT: Hilary Till

ABSTRACT. Price limits on commodity futures appear to restrict price discovery but not stop speculation. Consistent with delayed price discovery, returns continue in the same direction after limit days and do not reverse after one week, whereas returns are small after large price moves that do not hit limits. High volatility immediately before limits can be attributed to low inventories and increased stockout risk rather than excess speculation. Market participants trade similarly around limit days and non-limit days; speculators do not reduce their positions in response to limits. The options-implied futures price on the limit day predicts the next-day futures price, which suggests price discovery partially moves from the futures market to the options market.

14:30
Hilary Till (J.P. Morgan Center for Commodities, University of Colorado Denver Business School, USA)
Joseph Eagleeye (Quartile Risk, LLC, USA)
Richard Heckinger (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, USA)
Commodity Trading Strategies, Common Mistakes, and Catastrophic Blowups
SPEAKER: Hilary Till

ABSTRACT. Becoming an expert in the commodity markets has traditionally required a novice to seek an apprenticeship at an established commodity firm. This chapter provides an alternative approach: a reader is provided a reasonably comprehensive tour of the always dynamic and frequently opaque commodity markets, including views on (1) commodity trading strategies, (2) common mistakes, and (3) catastrophic blowups. The specific commodity trading strategies covered are trend-following and calendar spreads. The common mistakes that the chapter includes are (1) targeting returns rather than risk metrics, (2) establishing inappropriate trade sizing, and (3) failing to fully appreciate the psychological discipline required for trading. In addition, the chapter provides case studies on the catastrophic derivatives blowups at Amaranth and at MF Global.

13:30-15:00 Session 6B: Current Topics in energy finance
Chair:
Ivilina Popova (Texas State University, USA)
Location: C2
13:30
Joe Byers (Financial Seal, USA)
Ivilina Popova (Texas State University, USA)
Betty Simkins (Oklahoma State University, USA)
The Cost Implications of Managing Outliers in Commodities’ Prices
DISCUSSANT: Leonid Pugachev

ABSTRACT. Commodity derivatives are exposed to a variety of risks that usually do not impact financial derivatives. For example, the forces of supply and demand of the underlying commodity, weather, are just a few of those that influence the underlying price processes. The standard approach usually adopted by the market participants when analyzing and pricing commodity derivatives is to incorporate a normal component of these risks. However, sometimes a non-normal or jump event exists and its incorporation in the risk management and pricing processes should be carefully structured. The main difficulty is determining whether an event is permanent or not, and as a result, what is the impact on the risk management processes.

Outlier detection allows us to quantify the dimension and type of significant price changes in a commodity derivative. Once this identification is done, further impact analysis can be performed. This is important for a firm's risk management activities when hedging a commodity portfolio correctly. Hedging normal risk is executed with strategies appropriate for that type of risk. Different strategies are needed to hedge the non-normal risk that is found around extreme events or outliers.

Ignoring the content of an outlier's impact can cause the following:

1. Overstatement of normal risk of the portfolio, 2. Additional cost to hedge the overstated risk, 3. Inappropriate and inadequate hedges, 4. Misstatement of risk associated with extreme events, and 5. Poor scenario and sensitivity analysis.

14:00
Leonid Pugachev (University of Oklahoma, USA)
William L. Megginson (University of Oklahoma, USA)
Abdullah M. Almansur (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia)
Hedging Gone Wild: Was Delta Air Lines’ Purchase Of Trainer Refinery A Sound Risk Management Strategy?
DISCUSSANT: Alexander David

ABSTRACT. In April 2012, Delta Air Lines (Delta) announced it would purchase the mothballed Trainer oil refinery to hedge fuel price risk. Analysts and academics emphatically derided the move, stressing that Delta’s management was ill-equipped to oversee large scale refining operations. However, we show that debt- and equity-holders responded significantly positively to the acquisition announcement, and confirm that Trainer subsequently reduced Delta’s equity exposure to fuel price shocks. The refinery's operations also reduced Delta’s bond and loan spreads over time. We conclude that this unique experiment in vertical integration and commodity price hedging proved successful for the airline.

14:30
Alexander David (University of Calgary, Haskayne School of Business, Canada)
Exploration Activity, Long Run Decisions, and the Risk Premium in Energy Futures
DISCUSSANT: Joe Byers

ABSTRACT. We present evidence that the capital stock of firms in oil and gas exploration as well as oil inventories are each positively related to the slope of the futures curve, and negatively predict returns on holding crude oil futures contracts. We build an equilibrium model of resource extraction, exploration, and storage with these features. Capital lowers extraction costs as firms drill in increasingly expensive fields, while inventory helps smooth fluctuations in demand and extraction. The more aggressive supply response of producers during periods of high capital stocks implies that oil prices can decline in response to positive demand shocks, leading to a conditionally negative oil risk premium at such times. The model sheds light on the role of declining well quality on the positive trend of real oil prices in the current millennium, and the peaking of consumption.

13:30-15:00 Session 6C: Oil Risk III
Chair:
Christiane Baumeister (University of Notre Dame, USA)
Location: L1
13:30
Jimmy Hilliard (Auburn University, USA)
Jitka Hilliard (Auburn University, USA)
A Jump Diffusion Model for Pricing and Hedging with Margined Options: An Application to Brent Crude Contracts

ABSTRACT. We develop a jump-di¤usion model for pricing and hedging with margined options on futures. An attractive feature of margined options is that there is no early exercise premiums under plausible scenarios. Model parameter estimates and out-of-sample pricing errors are calculated using data on Brent Crude contracts. Using the same pricing technology, we also hedge equity style options with margined options. Hedging coefficients are derived by matching an extended set of Greeks. We find that a target equity option can be e¤ectively hedged using a portfolio of two margined options and the underlying. As has been reported elsewhere, a delta hedge is of little use when the underlying is a jump-di¤usion.

14:00
Christina Nikitopoulos Sklibosios (University of Technology Sydney, Australia)
Benjamin Cheng (University of Technology Sydney, Australia)
Erik Schlogl (University of Technology, Sydney, Australia)
Empirical hedging performance of long-dated crude oil derivatives

ABSTRACT. This paper presents an empirical study on hedging long-dated crude oil futures options with forward price models incorporating stochastic interest rates and stochastic volatility. Several hedging schemes are considered including delta, gamma, vega and interest rate hedge. Factor hedging is applied to the proposed multi-dimensional models and the corresponding hedge ratios are estimated by using historical crude oil futures prices, crude oil option prices and Treasury yields. Hedge ratios from stochastic interest rate models consistently improve hedging performance over hedge ratios from deterministic interest rate models, an improvement that becomes more pronounced over periods with high interest rate volatility, such as during the GFC. An interest rate hedge consistently improves hedging beyond delta, gamma and vega hedging, especially when shorter maturity contracts are used to roll the hedge forward. Furthermore, when the market experiences high interest rate volatility and the hedge is subject to high basis risk, adding interest rate hedge to delta hedge provides an improvement, while adding gamma and/or vega to the delta hedge at worsens performance.

14:30
Christiane Baumeister (University of Notre Dame, USA)
Lutz Kilian (University of Michigan, USA)
A General Approach to Recovering Market Expectations from Futures Prices With an Application to Crude Oil
DISCUSSANT: Jimmy Hilliard

ABSTRACT. Futures markets are a potentially valuable source of information about price expectations. Exploiting this information has proved difficult in practice, because time-varying risk premia often render the futures price a poor measure of the market expectation of the price of the underlying asset. Although this expectation in principle may be recovered by adjusting the futures price by the estimated risk premium, a common problem is that there are as many measures of the market expectation as there are estimates of the risk premium. We propose a general solution to this problem that allows us to select the most accurate estimate of the expectation for any set of risk premium estimates. We illustrate this approach by solving the long-standing problem of how to estimate the market expectation of the price of crude oil. We provide a new measure of oil price expectations that is substantially more accurate than the alternatives and more economically plausible. Our analysis has implications for the estimation of economic models of energy-intensive durables, for oil price forecasting, and for the measurement of oil price shocks.

13:30-15:00 Session 6D: Market Risk and Liquidity
Chair:
Lionel Lecesne (University of Paris-Seine Cergy-Pontoise, France)
Location: L5
13:30
Beyza Mina Ordu (Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University; Middle East Technical University, Turkey)
Adil Oran (Middle East Technical University, Turkey)
Ugur Soytas (Middle East Technical University, Turkey)
Is food financialized? Yes, but only when liquidity is abundant
DISCUSSANT: Ezgi Avci-Surucu

ABSTRACT. In this paper, we investigate whether commodity index trader (CIT) positions help to explain the increase in the correlations between agricultural commodities and equities starting around 2008. Some argue institutional investors who invest both in stock and commodity markets demolish the borders between these two seemingly unrelated markets and increase correlations, a recent phenomenon known as financialization. Yet, some others argue recently correlations have decreased back to historical levels and thus such increase between 2008 and 2012 was due to business cycle effect. Our results do not support one side but show that both factors are critically important to predict correlations between agricultural commodities and stocks. Furthermore, we depict CITs prefer to go back to their playgrounds under scarce liquidity and thus correlations decrease back to levels absent institutions. Hence, low liquidity is a significant obstacle inhibiting financialization to occur.

14:00
Ezgi Avci-Surucu (Erasmus University-Rotterdam School of Management, Netherlands)
Wolfgang Ketter (Erasmus University-Rotterdam School of Management, Netherlands)
Eric Van Heck (Erasmus University-Rotterdam School of Management, Netherlands)
Derek Bunn (London Business School, UK)
Managing Market Price Risk through Forecasting and Hedging: The effects of Market Informedness and Risk Aversion
DISCUSSANT: Lionel Lecesne

ABSTRACT. Information is a crucial component in the decision making process of trading agents. However, the presumption that individuals form rational expectations by accurately processing all available information and forming their forecasts accordingly has found mixed support in the empirical literature. In this paper we develop a conceptual model and empirically test the impact of agents’ attitudes (market informedness and risk aversion) on their price expectation (forecast accuracy) through their trading behaviour (use of forecasting and hedging). Using a unique data set consisting of 158 trading agents, we tested our hypotheses on real ex ante forecasts, evaluated ex post, in an electricity market context. Electricity markets are an ideal research setting as they require detailed information-processing and they clear through the actions of heterogeneous agents whose expectations have major effects on market efficiency. We have three main findings; firstly the results reveal the importance of the informational role of hedging (forward trading) on decreasing agents’ expectation biases. Secondly, although we find that more informed agents use more advanced forecasting methods, most surprisingly more information does not further enhance forecast accuracy. Thirdly, we show that agents’ risk aversions do not impact their trading behaviour, contrary to the conventional theoretical constructs. This paper is one of the first to take an information-based view to study the trading behaviour of agents and their price expectations; highlighting the importance of informational efficiency of forward trading and market informedness in the decision making process of trading agents. Implications for further research, market regulators and market participants are derived and discussed.

14:30
Lionel Lecesne (University of Paris-Seine Cergy-Pontoise, France)
Andrea Roncoroni (ESSEC Business School, France)
How Does Liquidity Affect Value, Risk, and Performance of Energy Equity Portfolios ?
DISCUSSANT: Beyza Mina Ordu

ABSTRACT. This paper investigates how market liquidity affects value, risk, and performance of energy equity portfolios. For this purpose we develop a model that compares a first setting free of liquidity frictions with a setting that is adjusted to illiquidity. The model is calibrated on a dataset of thirty energy equities traded on the NYSE. We deal with tick-by-tick data to estimate market liquidity parameters, which means that millions of trades are considered. The calibrated model is then used to conduct a variety of empirical experiments. As a first outcome, we find that the negative effect of illiquidity on value, risk, and performance behaves in a convex way with portfolio quantities. This suggests that impact of illiquidity may be minimized by holding optimal energy equity quantities. Most importantly, our second outcome establishes that the performance-based ranking of energy equity portfolios changes depending on whether liquidity is taken into consideration in performance evaluation or not. Precisely, a portfolio that is preferred to another when liquidity issues are ignored may actually be preferred when illiquidity is taken into account. This result holds under different performance measures as the Sharpe ratio or the risk-adjusted return on capital.

13:30-15:00 Session 6E: Energy markets
Chair:
Monika Papież (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)
Location: C3
13:30
Kris Jacobs (University of Houston, USA)
Craig Pirrong (University of Houston, USA)
Yu Li (University of Houston, USA)
Supply, Demand, and Risk Premiums in Electricity Markets
SPEAKER: Yu Li
DISCUSSANT: Monika Papież

ABSTRACT. We model the impact of supply and demand variables on the price of electricity futures in a no-arbitrage model, using daily data between 2003 and 2014. The model allows for unspanned economic risk, which is captured by the supply and demand variables but not identified by the futures price. The model provides a satisfactory fit as well as a consistent framework to study the interactions between the electricity futures and the demand and supply variables. We characterize the risk premium implied by the model and identify the risk premium components associated with demand and supply. The unspanned risk premium associated with supply is highly time-varying and constitutes the most important component of the total risk premium embedded in electricity futures. This risk premium becomes negative after 2010.

14:00
Monika Papież (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)
Sławomir Śmiech (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)
Katarzyna Frodyma (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)
The impact of development of the renewable energy sector in the EU on the relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth
DISCUSSANT: Takashi Kanamura

ABSTRACT. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of development of the renewable energy sector in the EU on the relationships between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in the period 1995-2014. The study is divided into two stages. During the first one, two groups of EU member countries are identified with reference to the level of development of their renewable energy sectors in the analysed period. Three variables - employment, turnover and investment in the renewable energy sector - are used to identify the countries with similar levels of development of this sector. During the second stage, the dynamic common correlated effect estimator proposed by Chudik and Pesaran (2015) is used in order to estimate the error correction models. The models allow for verification of the long-term and short-term relationships between non-renewable and renewable energy (or electricity) consumption and economic growth in both groups of countries and also as a robustness check for all EU countries. The results reveal that the level of development of the renewable energy sector influences linkages between energy consumption and economic growth. The findings on long-term output elasticities suggest that along with traditional inputs, such as capital and labour force, both renewable and non-renewable energy plays a significant role in the process of economic development in the countries with a relatively high level of development of the renewable energy sector. In the remaining countries only non-renewable energy is important in long-term equilibrium. The results obtained for a short-term perspective indicate bidirectional causal relations between renewable energy consumption and economic growth in the group of countries with a relatively high level of development of the renewable energy sector. In other countries only non-renewable energy (or electricity) consumption weakly influences their economic growth.

14:30
Takashi Kanamura (Kyoto University, Japan)
Supply-Side Perspective for Carbon Pricing
DISCUSSANT: Yu Li

ABSTRACT. This paper theoretically and empirically revisits carbon pricing from the supply-side perspective for carbon assets to solve a recent low price issue, which may delay the development of emission reduction technologies in the sense of marginal abatement costs. We propose a carbon pricing model linked to crude oil prices, which has historically been employed in supply-side driven pricing of long-term contracts for energy trading in the early stage. Since the model is designed to hold carbon prices between certain lower and upper boundaries using S-shaped carbon price linkage to crude oil prices, it can be useful to overcome a recent low carbon price issue. In addition, it is shown that the model can alleviate the difficulties of carbon derivative pricing in selecting market price of risk. Empirical studies using EUA and Brent crude oil futures prices estimate the parameters of the Brent crude oil-linked EUA price model. EUA prices simulated from the model with the parameter estimates are compared with historical EUA prices. The results suggest that simulated EUA prices from the model be kept relatively higher than historical EUA prices. This is preferable for accelerating carbon emission reductions in that emission reduction technologies with high marginal abatement costs are affordable. It may imply that EUA must be priced using a crude oil-linked carbon price model in the early stage of EUA trading until EUA markets are fully matured from the supply-side perspective for carbon asset pricing, not employing a premature market-based or supply and demand-based carbon price model. To show usefulness of crude oil-linked carbon pricing, we also give a numerical example of European carbon option pricing based on the Brent crude oil-linked EUA price model by using Crank-Nicolson finite difference method. Finally we discuss the relation between crude oil-linked carbon pricing and emission reduction risk. These studies may suggest carbon policy makers take into account of crude oil-linked carbon pricing to tackle low price and low liquidity issues of carbon assets.

13:30-15:00 Session 6F: Topics in Energy Finance
Chair:
Viviana Fanelli (University o Bari, Italy)
Location: C1
13:30
Zeigham Khokher (Tulane University, USA)
Mohammad Morovati (Stanford University, USA)
Shyam Sunder Venkatesan (Tulane University, USA)
Sheridan Titman (University of Texas, USA)
Real Options, Financial Constraints, and Drilling Rig Rental Rates
DISCUSSANT: Malte Rieth

ABSTRACT. We present a simple real options model that illustrates how changes in uncertainty can result in changes in equilibrium investment costs rather than in changes in investment levels. To empirically test the model, we examine a panel of oil rig rental rates. Our empirical analysis confirms that after we control for several relevant economic variables, price uncertainty negatively affects rig rates.

14:00
Daniel Bierbaumer (German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Germany)
Malte Rieth (German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Germany)
Anton Velinov (German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Germany)
Nonlinear Intermediary Asset Pricing in the Oil Futures Market
SPEAKER: Malte Rieth
DISCUSSANT: Viviana Fanelli

ABSTRACT. The paper studies the effects of nonlinear financial intermediary asset pricing in the oil futures market, using Markov switching in heteroskedasticity structural vector autoregressions. The empirical model is identified through theory-implied restrictions and allows for changes across regimes in both impact effects and volatility. The results suggest that the demand curve of financial intermediaries steepens significantly during turbulent times. This amplifies the price effects of all traders' demand shocks by two thirds. Additionally, the volatility of intermediaries' own demand shocks doubles during these episodes, further increasing volatility. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that binding capital constraints of intermediaries are related to volatility and imply nonlinear trading behavior. Finally, we show that interest rates are the best indicators of entering turbulent times.

14:30
Viviana Fanelli (University of Bari, Italy)
Mean-reverting Statistical Arbitrage in Commodity Markets

ABSTRACT. In this paper, we introduce the concept of statistical arbitrage through the definition of a trading strategy that captures persistent anomalies in long-run relationships among assets. We devise a methodology to individuate and test mean-reverting statistical arbitrage, and to develop trading strategies. Then, we empirically investigate the existence of statistical arbitrage opportunities in crude oil markets. In particular, we focus on long-term pricing relationships between the West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures and a so-called statistical portfolio, composed by other two crude oils, Brent and Dubai. Firstly, the cointegration regression is used to track the persistent pricing equilibrium, and mispricings arise when West Texas Intermediate crude oil price diverges from the statistical portfolio value. Secondly, we verify that mispricing dynamics revert back to equilibrium with a predictable behaviour, and we exploit this stylized fact by applying the trading rules commonly used in equity markets to the crude oil market. The trading performance is measured by three specific profit indicators on out-of-sample data. Finally, we use a Monte Carlo simulation approach to develop a model for forecasting the expected Value at Risk (VaR) of the adopted trading strategy over an established holding period.

16:00-17:00 Session : Keynote Speaker II: Hendrik Bessembinder -W.P. School of Business, Arizona State University

Measuring returns to those who invest in energy through futures

It is commonly asserted that maintaining an ongoing position in energy futures subjects the investor to a gain or loss referred to as a ‘roll yield’, which refers to the difference in price across futures contracts at the time positions are closed and opened.   In fact, the roll yield as a gain or loss to an investor is mythical.  Futures investors earn or pay the price change that occurs while they hold a given contract, not any difference in prices across contracts.   However, the roll yield does contain useful and relevant information

Chair:
Andrea Roncoroni (ESSEC, France)
Location: L1