Faced with the COVID-19 pandemic, government and civil society had to pay attention to response teams (1, 2). The disaster psychological care program (APSIDE) begins with Kirk Strosal's first-rate intervention "Focused acceptance and commitment therapy" in a single session. Results: 104 individual interventions. Of the users, 68% experience anger and other emotions, with ineffective regulatory behaviors such as avoidance. Once the intervention is concluded, 60% of users report a utility aimed at effective emotional regulation. Performing the first-rate intervention with an evidence-based strategy should be a rule at any level of attention; but also assessing whether the intervention was useful, allows people to generalize what they have learned or develop strategies during the intervention. Performing this type of work provides evidence on the usefulness of the intervention model.

References. 1. Romero, A. Porteny. T., Navarro, C. & Cervantes, A. (2009). Impacto psicosocial de la epidemia de influenza A (H1N1) en pacientes, familiares de pacientes y personal de salud. Un estudio exploratorio. Reporte final interno. 2. Procel, C. G., Padilla, Y. S., & Loaiza, G. P. (2018). Fatiga por compasión en los profesionales del servicio de emergencia. Dominio de las Ciencias, 4(1), 483-498. 3. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 4. De la Torre, M., y Pardo, R. (2017). Guía para la intervención telepsicológica. Madrid. Colegio Oficial de la Psicología: Madrid.