View: session overviewtalk overview
Great Lakes B Room
Defining and Investigating Automaticity in Text Comprehension
Katherine A. Rawson, Kent State University
Introductory Remarks: Jennifer Wiley
In the literature on text comprehension, automaticity has traditionally been defined in terms of properties of performance (e.g., speed, effort). A more powerful approach based on contemporary theories of automaticity involves conceptualizing automaticity in terms of underlying cognitive mechanisms that give rise to properties of interest. To illustrate the utility of automaticity theories for understanding text comprehension, the bulk of my talk will focus on one particular kind of automaticity theory, which states that practice leads to decreasing involvement of algorithmic processing and increasing involvement of memory-based processing. I will present evidence from studies specifically designed to diagnose the involvement of memory-based automaticity in syntactic and semantic processes during text comprehension, and I will also review findings from earlier studies that provide indirect evidence for this account. Finally, I will consider directions for future research and theory development to address outstanding issues concerning the nature of automaticity in text comprehension.
| 14:45 | Exploitation of Theory for Applied Problems: Let’s Throw it at the Wall and See What Sticks SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. We will present third year outcomes of an IES Goal 5 (measurement) project explore innovative solutions for K to 8th reading development. The preferred outcome is a fully-automated technology-based measure that yields profiles for skills analysis and narrow band measures for repeated measurement and monitoring. The team will present some combination of four solutions they developed and field tested. Kane’s (2006, 2011) validation framework and instructional implications will frame the presentation. |
| 15:03 | The MOCCA Measurement Model: Challenges and Possible Solutions SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. The Multiple-choice Online Cloze Comprehension reading comprehension test for 3rd – 5th grades has a unique structure in which each incorrect alternative corresponds to a type of inference error. This structure requires revised thinking about measurement issues: reliability, an appropriate item response model, and interpretation of error responses for diagnostic purposes. The presentation will cover scoring of error responses, selecting an appropriate item response theory, and developing a decision rule for diagnosing error tendencies. |
| 15:21 | Implementing cognitive theory into 3rd through 12 grade reading assessments: Opportunities and challenges. SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Over 11,000 students in grades 3-12 completed two scenario-based reading comprehension tests. The computer-based tests required students to read a collection of sources for a specific purpose. Analyses revealed the tests had adequate properties and were feasible to implement in a real school setting. A vertical scale was created to examine how performance on the assessment changes over grades. Despite the complexity, even some younger students can engage in complex reading in a structured environment. |
| 15:39 | The Reading Strategy Assessment Tool: A computer-based approach for evaluation comprehension processes during reading SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Our presentation summarizes a reading assessment called R-SAT (Reading Strategy Assessment Tool). R-SAT has students answer questions as they read narrative and expository text. The answers are analyzed using word-based algorithms which provide indices of overall comprehension and particular strategies used to create meaning (bridging and elaborative inferences, and paraphrasing). We present two studies which assess the tool’s ability to identify the presence of comprehension processes. We conclude with a discussion on RSAT’s potential use in formative assessment, its limitations, and our future plans. |
| 15:57 | Discussant Remarks: Reading Assessment SPEAKER: Arthur C. Graesser |
| 14:45 | Is the Moon a Satellite? “No, it is a Big Piece of Rock. It’s a Moon!” Examining Scientific Reasoning in Elementary Students’ Performance on Scenario-based Assessments SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. The study examines scientific reasoning of elementary students. Students were administered a scenario-based assessment on science topics. Questions were designed to direct their attention and probe understanding of key text content. A culminating question asked them to apply what they learned and explain their reasoning. While many students scored highly on the test, only a subgroup of top scoring students provided adequate explanations. Results are interpreted with respect to quality of causal/situation model formation. |
| 15:03 | The Influence of Causal Markers on the Evaluation of Self-Produced Explanations SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. We investigated the effect of causal markers on the perceived quality of self-produced explanations. Across two studies, participants wrote answers to scientific why-questions, and then evaluated these responses. In Study 1, answers containing causal markers were rated significantly higher, and were more likely accepted as explanations. In Study 2, there was a trending effect of causal marker on perceived quality, but participants’ confidence in answering these questions may have confounded quality ratings. |
| 15:21 | Readability and Mathematical Word Problem Solving SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Solving mathematics story problems requires text comprehension skills. However, previous studies have found few connections between traditional measures of text readability and performance on story problems. We hypothesized that measures of readability and topic incidence measured by text-mining tools may illuminate associations between text difficulty and problem-solving measures. Using problems solved through an online algebra program, we found that several indicators of story problem readability and topic of story problems were associated problem-solving performance. |
| 15:39 | Repetition in Mathematics Discussions: Bridging Education and Cognitive Science Perspectives SPEAKER: Susan Staats ABSTRACT. Repetition, a common characteristic of speech, involves reuse of a syntactic structure, with or without repeated lexical elements. Discourse analysis of mathematics classroom conversations highlights the significance of repetition as a shared linguistic resource for emergent argumentation. The presentation summarizes related experimental findings from psycholinguistics and cognitive science in order to argue that syntactic repetition is a potential bridging theme between the fields of education and cognitive science. |
| 15:57 | Using a Deductive Reasoning Task to Improve Readers’ Construction of Generalization Inferences SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Readers draw generalization inferences to combine several facts into one superordinate theme. College students who received training on deductive reasoning prior to reading expository texts drew a higher number of accurate generalization inferences than a control group receiving no training. This suggests a theoretical link between inferences and reasoning as well as provided a novel approach to reading intervention. |
| 16:15 | Examining Expository Text Recall and Comprehension Using Factor Analysis SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. In this study, 255 fifth graders read and listened to two expository passages, provided oral retells, and answered comprehension questions. Confirmatory factor analyses and item-level crossed random effects modeling were used to predict question performance using retell elements. Findings suggest retell factors and prior knowledge significantly predict passage comprehension. Findings also support the use of factor analysis in examining retell data, specifically pertaining to text representation. |
| 16:15 | Did Writing Help the Winner of Nobel Prize in Literature: A Case Study of Mo Yan’s Language Style and Childhood Trauma SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. This paper examined the changes of Moyan’s linguistic style with automated linguistic analyses methods to see whether this writer suffered from childhood trauma and overcame it through expressive writing. The results did not prove significant evidence of childhood trauma and subsequent healing. It could be related to the cultural difference between Chinese and English. The same linguistic feature might reflect different psychological states in different language. |
| 16:15 | Effect of Feedback and Comprehension Level on Task-oriented Reading: A Think-aloud Study SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. We evaluated how good and poor comprehenders engaged in relevancy processing in a task oriented situation and responded to feedback. Students did the task while thinking aloud on one of the texts and reading silently on the other text. Surprisingly, the ability to identify relevant information in the text and answer the questions was negatively affected by thinking aloud. Analyses of the think-aloud protocols yielded insights into why this was the case. |
| 16:15 | “This one over there?”: Children's Reference to Near and Far Objects SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Many skills required for successful reference continue to develop well into childhood. In this study we investigate whether children modify their deictic language to accommodate differences in visual perspective and spatial dynamics between themselves and their listener. We found that speakers use a higher proportion of proximal reference forms for physically proximal referents, though they’re more likely to use proximal forms for distant referents when their visual perspective differed substantially from their interlocutor’s. |
| 16:15 | Are Hybrid Cars The Answer? Thinking About Solutions When Learning About Climate Change. SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. This study examined whether solution-based prompts improve learning from document sets in science, by increasing the perceived utility of constructing causal explanations. Solution-based reading prompts led to better recall of information and better responses on a solution generation task, however no differences were seen on an inference-verification task. Future work is needed to identify when solution-based prompts might be more likely to help readers to refine their task models and improve understanding from science texts. |
| 16:15 | What’s in a Response? An Investigation of How Two Think-aloud Worlds Collide SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Responses from two think-aloud tasks (traditional; closed forced-choice) were used to identify whether good and poor comprehenders utilize similar comprehension processes across the two methods. Results from 3rd-5th grade readers’ responses provide initial support for validating the types of processes used during comprehension of narratives. Additional analyses will be conducted to determine if these findings replicate across diverse demographic groups. Results could inform the development of new instructional methods for improving struggling readers' comprehension skills. |
| 16:15 | Assessing skill in task-based relevance judgments in a multiple documents situation. SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Multiple document readers may have difficulty disengaging from familiar reading strategies based on text importance and engaging task-based relevance strategies. To investigate, we had participants read texts about different topics and rate sentences for text-based importance or relevance to an across-documents reading goal. Comparisons of within-group agreement suggested comparable skill, with a non-significant trend towards greater agreement for relevance raters. Additionally, interest in the across-documents topic was positively correlated with agreement for both groups. |
| 16:15 | Am I Wrong or Am I Right? Gains in Monitoring Accuracy in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Writing SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. We investigated whether students increased their self-assessment accuracy and essay scores over the course of an intervention with a writing strategy intelligent tutoring system system, W-Pal. Results indicate that students were able to learn from W-Pal, and that the combination of strategy instruction, game-based practice, and holistic essay-based practice led to equivalent gains in self-assessment accuracy compared to heavier doses of deliberate writing practice (offering twice the amount of system feedback). |
| 16:15 | College Writers' Revision Processes: Potential Influences of Experience, Knowledge and Task Representations SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. We examined text revision processes in beginning and advanced college writers, focusing on the relation between writers’ initial mental representation of the writing task and their revisions processes. Participants thought aloud while planning, writing and revising an essay. The number of verbalizations related to task representations was moderately correlated with the number of revisions. Advanced writers made more content and organization revisions, although beginning writers knew these aspects of an essay were important. |
| 16:15 | The Effect of Natural Gender Cues on the Acquisition of Grammatical Gender SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. For students attempting to acquire a second language with grammatical gender, learning the gender of each new noun can prove to be a daunting and frustrating task. This study investigates whether the presentation of biological sex cues during the acquisition of L2 nouns can enhance memory of the associated grammatical gender. Preliminary data analyses suggest that participants may not automatically encode and use biological gender cues during the acquisition of L2 nouns. |
| 16:15 | Divergent Memory and Metacognitive Effects of Expository and Narrative Texts SPEAKER: Scott R. Hinze ABSTRACT. This study demonstrates differences in readers’ memory and metacognitive judgments for expository and narrative texts. Participants read and rated 16 short expository or narrative descriptions of psychological phenomena, with critical content held consistent, and completed an immediate or delayed test. Readers demonstrated higher interest and metacognitive appraisals for narratives, but greater retention for content from expository texts. Narratives may inflate metacognitive judgments for psychological content. Differences across experiments, and implications will be discussed. |
| 16:15 | Factors that Impact the Integration of Multiple Texts SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. The current study examined how the coherence of a first text and causal chain completeness influenced the integration of information across texts. Contrary to expectations, increased cohesiveness did not improve integration. However, participants given an integrated causal model demonstrated better integration of the chain information than participants given a chain divided across two texts. A second experiment addressed limitations of the first experiment by examining the effect of text boundaries and organization on integration. |
| 16:15 | Differential Processing of Aspectual Meanings by Higher and Lower-Skilled Readers during Narrative Comprehension SPEAKER: Andreas Schramm ABSTRACT. The role of grammatical aspect in establishing causal relationships across sentences in narratives was examined in this study. Lower and higher-skilled comprehenders read short narratives that included causes and effects. Unexpectedly, lower-skilled readers seem to have better recall during processing if the cause was in the imperfective (was passing) rather than the perfective (passed) aspect. It appears lower-skilled readers encode aspect moment-to-moment, and higher-skilled readers create representations that are ‘good enough.’ |
| 16:15 | Did I Hear It or Did I read It? Memory for Source Modality and Content SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. How does the source modality (oral vs. written) of an information affect its memorization? After having been exposed to short stories in one of these two modalities, participants performed a surprise recognition test during which they also recalled the modality in which the story had been presented. Content memory was greater for stories presented in the written modality, whereas source modality memory was greater for stories presented orally. Implications for conversational memory are discussed. |
| 16:15 | Individual Differences in Standards of Coherence for Short and Long-Distance Causal Inferences SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. In a dual-task eye-tracking experiment (reading/memory-load task), we studied the relation between causal inferences, standards of coherence, and reading skill. An increased cognitive load induced slower reading and poorer comprehension. Longer processing did not improve performance of less-skilled readers. For skilled readers, longer first-pass processing lead to better performance on long- but not short-distance causal inferences. This indicates that flexibility in standards of coherence depends on reading skill and is elicited by high cognitively demand. |
| 16:15 | Development and Evaluation of a Computer-Based Reading Span Task SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Working memory is the cognitive system that performs maintenance and manipulation of information for brief periods of time. Reading span tasks are commonly used to measure individual differences in working memory, but are inefficient to administer. This presentation addresses the creation and evaluation of an automated, computerized reading span task intended for use in applied settings. This innovative tool may help school psychologists and educators determine an underlying source of reading comprehension difficulties. |
| 16:15 | Effect of Local and Global Reading Skills on Argumentation Skill SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Over 1,300 students in grades 5-6 completed a scenario-based reading comprehension test that measured local and global comprehension as well as select argumentation skills. The assessment structured and sequenced tasks to build up students understanding as they integrated multiple sources. The results indicated the assessment displayed adequate properties and younger students were able to show evidence of higher-level thinking. However, lower level comprehension processes did predict a large amount variance in students’ argumentation skill. |
| 16:15 | The Use of Source-related Strategies in Reading Multiple Psychology Texts: An Expert-Novice Comparison SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Multiple text processing can benefit from paying attention to sources. This study compared first-year students (novices) and scientists in psychology (experts) regarding their use of source-related information for evaluating the credibility of multiple texts, using a think-aloud procedure. Experts’ credibility judgments were more accurate than novices’ judgments and their superior performance was explained by their use of source-related strategies. This suggests that source-related strategies are acquired as part of the disciplinary expertise during academic training. |
| 16:15 | Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Cognitive Load in Multiple Document Reading Situations SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. The main purpose of this study was to design and analyze the psychometric properties of a test for measuring cognitive load in multiple documents reading situations. A first 24 item-pilot test consisting of a three factor structure was administered to a sample of 66 university students of Education. The questionnaire has proved to be reliable at least in a two-factor solution, Perceived Difficulty (IL – EL) and Germaine Load (GL); nevertheless its potential adaptation into a three factor structure and future applications will be further discussed. |
| 16:15 | Updating During Reading for Skilled and Less-Skilled Readers SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. The current experiments examined whether less-skilled readers would be able to encode and integrate causal updating information to the same extent as skilled readers. The results of Experiment 1 and 2 demonstrated that one sentence of causal updating information was encoded and did aid less-skilled readers in updating, as evidenced by the recall results, however the reading times indicated that skilled and less-skilled readers may have a different timetable for integration. |
| 16:15 | Prediction of Word Reading and Morphological Awareness in Chinese Reading Comprehension from Kindergarten to Grade 5. SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. A cross-sequential design (Cohort I: 5-6 to 7-8-year-olds; Cohort II: 7-9 to 9-11-year-olds) was investigated for the relationship between Chinese morphological awareness, character reading and reading comprehension. Character reading predicts reading comprehension mainly for younger children. Morphological abilities predict comprehension mainly at macrostructure and situational model. The results imply that the ability of operating morphemes flexibly supports higher levels of reading comprehension. |
| 16:15 | Identifying and Processing Internet Sources in a Critical Reading Task SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. This study was to examine how adolescent readers explore, evaluate, and learn from multiple Internet sources to generate critical questions about a controversial issue. Multiple data sources were used to infer a linkage between readers’ epistemic beliefs (Internet-Specific Epistemological Questionnaire), reading strategy use (verbal reports and screen captures), and learning from multiple sources (pre/post knowledge measures). Findings and implications are discussed in relation to the complexities of strategic patterns for Internet reading. |
| 16:15 | Detecting Differences in Narratives Adaptations SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. We explored the types of information people tend to notice as different across narrative adaptations. Participants either read or watched a story, and then were presented with the other version of the story (i.e., Read/View or View/Read). In the view/read condition, participants emphasized noticing differences in the novel’s verbal content, whereas in the read/view condition, participants emphasized noticing differences in the film’s narrative events. These patterns reflect differences in people’s processing of film and text. |
| 16:15 | The Role of Phonological and Semantic Storage and Processing in Children’s Reading Comprehension SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. In this study we investigated whether individual differences in children’s reading comprehension is best explained by variation in general processing aspects or storage aspects tapped by working memory span tasks. The role of storage has possibly been underestimated by focusing on storage measures that mainly tap into phonological processing, and not into semantic processing. We addressed this issue in 117 Dutch 5th graders. Storage aspects played a more significant role than indicated by previous studies. |
| 16:15 | Establishing Discourse Coherence: An Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Evidential Marking, Recency and Particularity of Asserted Knowledge SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Evidentiality, a property found in many languages, commonly refers to the linguistic marking (in the grammar or the lexicon) of source of knowledge about an asserted event. What is unclear is whether this property also conveys epistemic value (or reliability of the source). Testing reliability of evidential sources indirectly, previous experimental investigations, conducted mostly with child samples, demonstrated that first-hand source markers were treated as more trustworthy than non first-hand markers, as children based their decisions on what was stated in the first-hand form (e.g., Aksu-Koc & Alici, 2000; Fitneva, 2001; 2008; 2009; Öztürk & Papafragou, 2005). The present experiment sought to expand the scope of investigation into the epistemic implications of evidential markers by examining in adults how different combinations of evidential markers may influence the establishment of discourse cohesion. The study compared evidential marking of first hand source with that of two different types of non-first hand sources - hearsay and inference - in two different groups: speakers of Turkish, a language in which evidentiality is grammaticalized, and speakers of English, a language in which evidentiality is conveyed in the lexicon. It was hypothesized that, regardless of language, first hand source marking would be relied on more than inference or hearsay knowledge, and that inference marking would be considered more influential than hearsay in the establishment of discourse coherence, following de Haan’s (1998) evidential hierarchy hypothesis. Two additional variables were factorially examined: the order of presentation of the particular pairings of evidentials (to test if the more recently encountered information is relied on more) and the nature of the asserted information (to test if more particular assertions carry more weight than general assertions). The experiment used a discourse completion task in which participants read sentences (in their respective language) containing different evidential expressions that resulted in somewhat contradictory information, as in: Jack was afraid of heights. But he reportedly/apparently rented an apartment on the 10th floor. Jack ___.” Participants were asked to supply a third sentence that would make sense of the first two. Three different evidential markers, presented in each combination, were examined (first hand vs. hearsay, first hand vs. inference, and inference vs. hearsay). Furthermore, each evidential marker was presented either in the first or the second sentence; e.g., Jack was reportedly afraid of heights. But he rented an apartment on the 10th floor. Jack ___. Finally, the asserted fact was either stated in a general form first or in a particular form first; e.g., Jack rented an apartment on the 10th floor. But he was reportedly afraid of heights. Jack ___. Analyses of the relative influence of the evidential marker, the ordering of the markers, and the nature of the information asserted on the way the discourse was completed showed main effects and interaction effects. Whereas evidential marking affected responses, it was not a particularly strong effect, and its influence was tempered by presentation order and type of information (general vs. particular). Interestingly, Turkish speakers appeared to place more emphasis on the nature of the fact in arriving at their response, whereas English speakers were more influenced by the order of presentation of the information. That is, English speakers demonstrated a source order effect: regardless of the order of presentation of general and particular facts, they relied on the evidentially stronger information when it was presented in the second sentence. In the example, Jack was apparently/reportedly afraid of heights. But he rented an apartment on the tenth floor of a high-rise, English speakers completed the third sentence in a way that indicated that they believed that Jack had rented the apartment. However, when the stronger evidence appeared in the first sentence, their reliance on the strong evidence was around chance level. This finding can be considered as a recency effect; that is, English speakers tended to complete the third sentence by relying on the most recent fact they encountered, regardless of the evidential source of the sentence. On the other hand, Turkish speakers demonstrated a recency effect only when the sentences were presented in the order of general fact first and particular fact second. This was the case for both source order conditions. Thus, when the stronger evidential marker was presented in the second sentence Turkish speakers’ reliance on that information increased. When the stronger evidence marker was presented in the first sentence, their reliance on the strong evidence decreased, as was the case for English speakers. However, when the sentences were presented in the order of particular sentence first and general sentence second, the tendency to rely on the recent fact disappeared. Turkish speakers were more likely to rely on the strong evidence (56.65%) even though the recent fact indicated contradicting information. Thus, Turkish speakers appear to demonstrate an attributional bias whereby they tended to rely on the particular situational fact (Jack rented an apartment on the tenth floor of a high-rise) over the general fact (he was afraid of heights). Making sense of information is central to how people understand and produce discourse. This study is the first factorial investigation of the relative influence of evidential markers, information recency, and information generality on strategies for establishing discourse coherence. The findings uncovered a complex pattern of group differences in the relative influence of the factors manipulated. More generally, the results add to a growing body of work showing how linguistic framing affects cognitive performance, in this case, discourse coherence. This work has clear implications for the interpretation of discourse in settings such as courtrooms, political elections, medical environments, marketing, or academia. References Aksu-Koc, A., & Alici, D. M. (2000). Understanding sources of beliefs and marking of uncertainty: The child’s theory of evidentiality. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirtieth annual child language research forum (pp. 123-130). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language & Information. de Haan, F. (1998). The cognitive basis of visual evidentials. In A. Cienki, B. J. Luka, & M. B. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 91-105). Stanford: CSLI Publications. Fitneva, S. A. (2001). Epistemic marking and reliability judgments: Evidence from Bulgarian. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 401-420. Fitneva, S. A. (2008). The role of evidentiality in Bulgarian children’s reliability judgments. Journal of Child Language, 35, 845-868. Fitneva, S. A. (2009). Evidentiality and trust: The effect of informational goals. In S. A. Fitneva & T. Matsui (Eds.), Evidentiality: A window into language and cognitive development, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (pp. 49–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Öztürk, Ö., & Papafragou, A. (2005). The acquisition of evidentiality in Turkish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 1-14. |
| 16:15 | Detection of Temporal Shifts Involving Same and Different Locations in Narrative Comprehension SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Readers track temporal information when reading stories. Previous studies show that situation models are updated when readers encounter temporal shifts. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these temporal shifts remain unclear. By measuring reading times of target sentences and the accuracy rates and reaction times of judgments of (im)possible events, we determined that readers monitored temporal information. Importantly, readers’ subjective time estimates predicted temporal shift detection, consistent with the notion that temporal concepts are embodied. |
| 16:15 | The Function of Repetition in Discourse Community Initiation: A Case Study of Peer Tutoring in a WAC Writing Center SPEAKER: Rachel Holtz ABSTRACT. For decades, writing center administrators have debated whether or not writing center tutors should be—or need to be—familiar with course content in order to be helpful to a tutee (Hubbuch, S., 1988; Kiedaisch, J. & Dinitz, S., 1993; Walker, K., 1998). One argument is that generalist writing tutors don’t need to be familiar with the content and actually they shouldn’t be; being unfamiliar with discipline-specific knowledge forces tutees to articulate and explain themselves much more thoroughly, which may result in a deeper understanding of the tutee’s subject knowledge (Healy, D., 1991; Hubbuch, S., 1998; Luce, H., 1986; Pemberton, M., 1995). Furthermore, this model can perhaps even mitigate the inherent tutor-tutee hierarchy present in writing centers (Devet, B. et al., 1995). On the other hand, some argue that writing center tutors need to be familiar with not only the course content but also the discourse community in order to help students connect disciplinary writing with disciplinary thinking and internalization (McLeod, S., 2001). As a result, these specialist discipline-specific writing tutors can help initiate students into the academic community that establishes, regulates, and maintains disciplinary epistemology, and in order to do that, these writing tutors must be more than familiar with the discourse: they must practice and live it (McLeod, S. 2001; Kiedaisch, J. & Dinitz, S., 1993; Walker, K., 1998). With this debate as its foundation, this sociolinguistic case study examines whether discourse community initiation actually occurs in a writing center session when a student meets with a discipline-specific writing tutor, and if it does, how it manifests in that interaction. The analysis focuses on a single student who is enrolled in two writing-intensive courses in two un-related fields: English and Psychology. Transcripts and video clips from two video recorded tutoring sessions—one session involving this student and her ENGL 210 peer tutor and the other session involving this student and her PSYC 202 peer tutor—provide the data for an ethnomethodological, pragmatic, and discourse analysis. Data allow for both description and comparison of how this student and her writing are supported in each discipline. Interesting linguistic patterns emerged in both tutoring sessions, the most frequent being word and phrase repetition—first on the tutors’ parts and then on the student’s part. I argue that the peer tutors engage in lexical, syntactic, and paralinguistic repetition in their sessions in order to explain discipline-specific information and encourage the student to feel more comfortable with the organizational configurations of knowledge within a particular discipline. Thus, the peer tutors use forms of repetition to introduce the student to what Elaine Maimon (as cited in McLeod, 2001) calls “turns of social behavior” within a particular discipline. In return, the student engages in repetition as a way of expressing an initial understanding of academic community conventions. According to Paul Friedrich (1986), this level of repetition is consistent with first language acquisition, specifically in children (as cited in Tannen, 1987). More importantly to writing center work, the repetition that occurs during these two session conversations exemplifies Deborah Tannen’s (1989) argument that repetition creates linguistic coherence in conversations, thereby allowing participants to join the interaction and be able to make meaning from it. Comparing how a single student learns to write and think in two distinct disciplines yields a rich discussion of the composition standards of these disciplines and how discipline-specific writing tutors can promote academic discourse community membership through their writing center sessions. With this investigation I am hoping to shed new light on the stale and abandoned deliberation of the generalist vs. specialist and suggest implications for future writing center models. References Devet, Bonnie, et al. “Writing Lab Consultants Talk about Helping Students Writing Across the Disciplines.” Writing Lab Newsletter 19.9 (1995): 8-10. McLeod, Susan. “The Pedagogy of Writing Across the Curriculum.” A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. Eds. Gary Tate, Amy Rupiper, and Kurt Schick. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 149-64. Print. Kiedaisch, Jean and Sue Dinitz. "Look Back and Say "So What": The Limitations of the Generalist Tutor." Writing Center Journal 14.1. (1993): 63-75. Web. Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63(3), 574-605. Walker, Kristen. "The Debate over Generalist and Specialist Tutors: Genre Theory's Contribution." Writing Center Journal 18.2. (1998): 27-47. Web. |
Must have purchased ticket during registration. Meet in Hotel Lobby at 6:15 PM; Game starts at 7:10. http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/